The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short-Term Load and Wind Power Forecasting Using Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals
Abstract
Electrical power systems are evolving from today's centralized bulk systems to more decentralized systems. Penetrations of renewable energies, such as wind and solar power, significantly increase the level of uncertainty in power systems. Accurate load forecasting becomes more complex, yet more important for management of power systems. Traditional methods for generating point forecasts of load demands cannot properly handle uncertainties in system operations. To quantify potential uncertainties associated with forecasts, this paper implements a neural network (NN)-based method for the construction of prediction intervals (PIs). A newly introduced method, called lower upper bound estimation (LUBE), is applied and extended to develop PIs using NN models. A new problem formulation is proposed, which translates the primary multiobjective problem into a constrained single-objective problem. Compared with the cost function, this new formulation is closer to the primary problem and has fewer parameters. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) integrated with the mutation operator is used to solve the problem. Electrical demands from Singapore and New South Wales (Australia), as well as wind power generation from Capital Wind Farm, are used to validate the PSO-based LUBE method. Comparative results show that the proposed method can construct higher quality PIs for load and wind power generation forecasts in a short time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Cited by
A Novel Hybrid Short-Term Load Forecasting Method of Smart Grid Using MLR and LSTM Neural Network
Li, J., Deng, D., Zhao, J., Cai, D., Hu, W., Zhang, M., & Huang, Q. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3000184 · Cited by 269
Short-term electric load forecasting based on improved Extreme Learning Machine Mode
Yuan, J., Wang, L., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, H., & Liao, Y. (2021) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.067 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Quan, H., Srinivasan, D., & Khosravi, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 303-315
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2068928057
- Cited by
- 614
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Short-Term Load and Wind Power Forecasting Using Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2013.2276053
- The paper
- Quan, H., Srinivasan, D., & Khosravi, A. (2014). Short-Term Load and Wind Power Forecasting Using Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2013.2276053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.