Cited by 1,777Machine Learning and Data ClassificationText and Document Classification TechnologiesAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Classification in the Presence of Label Noise: A Survey

Frenay, Benoit, Verleysen, Michel·2014·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

Label noise is an important issue in classification, with many potential negative consequences. For example, the accuracy of predictions may decrease, whereas the complexity of inferred models and the number of necessary training samples may increase. Many works in the literature have been devoted to the study of label noise and the development of techniques to deal with label noise. However, the field lacks a comprehensive survey on the different types of label noise, their consequences and the algorithms that consider label noise. This paper proposes to fill this gap. First, the definitions and sources of label noise are considered and a taxonomy of the types of label noise is proposed. Second, the potential consequences of label noise are discussed. Third, label noise-robust, label noise cleansing, and label noise-tolerant algorithms are reviewed. For each category of approaches, a short discussion is proposed to help the practitioner to choose the most suitable technique in its own particular field of application. Eventually, the design of experiments is also discussed, what may interest the researchers who would like to test their own algorithms. In this paper, label noise consists of mislabeled instances: no additional information is assumed to be available like e.g., confidences on labels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2013.2292894

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 332 · Cited by 1,777

Authors
Frenay, B., & Verleysen, M.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2014-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
845-869
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W2167460663
Cited by
1,777
References
332
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 153 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 169 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 248 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 160 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
71.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
label noise, robust classification, classification accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review