The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-Trial Classification of Event-Related Potentials in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Tasks Using Supervised Spatial Filtering
Open accessAbstract
Accurate detection of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) is a difficult problem that requires efficient signal processing and machine learning techniques. Supervised spatial filtering methods that enhance the discriminative information in EEG data are commonly used to improve single-trial ERP detection. We propose a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a layer dedicated to spatial filtering for the detection of ERPs and with training based on the maximization of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The CNN is compared with three common classifiers: 1) Bayesian linear discriminant analysis; 2) multilayer perceptron (MLP); and 3) support vector machines. Prior to classification, the data were spatially filtered with xDAWN (for the maximization of the signal-to-signal-plus-noise ratio), common spatial pattern, or not spatially filtered. The 12 analytical techniques were tested on EEG data recorded in three rapid serial visual presentation experiments that required the observer to discriminate rare target stimuli from frequent nontarget stimuli. Classification performance discriminating targets from nontargets depended on both the spatial filtering method and the classifier. In addition, the nonlinear classifier MLP outperformed the linear methods. Finally, training based AUC maximization provided better performance than training based on the minimization of the mean square error. The results support the conclusion that the choice of the systems architecture is critical and both spatial filtering and classification must be considered together.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has extensively explored the combination of xDAWN with classification algorithms, yielding promising results.”
From A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Wu, Y., & Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271368 · Cited by 27,236
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Ferrari, V. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,123
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919
(2005) · Cited by 5,977
Mackay, D. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 · Cited by 4,440
Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1988) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · Cited by 3,228
Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis
Simard, P. Y., Steinkraus, D., & Platt, J. C. (2005) · IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) · doi:10.1109/icdar.2003.1227801 · Cited by 2,862
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.21.1.109 · Cited by 1,465
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G., & Müller, K. (1998) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 1,333
Event-related potential studies of attention.
Luck, S., Woodman, G., & Vogel, E. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01545-x · Cited by 1,209
An empirical evaluation of deep architectures on problems with many factors of variation
Larochelle, H., Erhan, D., Courville, A. C., Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2007) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273556 · Cited by 1,024
Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.
Potter, M. C. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509 · Cited by 1,022
Johnson, R. (1986) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00649.x · Cited by 960
(2007) · Cited by 937
LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Orr, G., & Müller, K. R. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-49430-8_2 · Cited by 920
An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects
Hoffmann, U., Vesin, J.-M., Ebrahimi, T., & Diserens, K. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.005 · Cited by 859
Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1656 · Cited by 788
Convolutional Neural Networks for P300 Detection with Application to Brain-Computer Interfaces
Cecotti, H., & Graser, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.125 · Cited by 778
Self-citationxDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface
Rivet, B., Souloumiac, A., Attina, V., & Gibert, G. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2012869 · Cited by 537
AUC Optimization vs. Error Rate Minimization
Cortes, C., & Mohri, M. (2003) · Cited by 530
BCI competition III: Dataset II—Ensemble of SVMs for BCI P300 speller
Rakotomamonjy, A., & Guigue, V. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2008.915728 · Cited by 512
Scaling Learning Algorithms toward AI
Bengio, Y., & LeCun, Y. (2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7496.003.0016 · Cited by 483
Müller, K., Tangermann, M., Dornhege, G., Krauledat, M., Curio, G., & Blankertz, B. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.022 · Cited by 475
Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape
Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. (1996) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00230-8 · Cited by 424
Classification of patterns of EEG synchronization for seizure prediction
Mirowski, P., Madhavan, D., LeCun, Y., & Kuzniecky, R. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.002 · Cited by 380
Learning long‐range vision for autonomous off‐road driving
Hadsell, R. T., Sermanet, P., Ben, J., Erkan, A., Scoffier, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Müller, U., & LeCun, Y. (2009) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20276 · Cited by 314
P300 amplitude is determined by target‐to‐target interval
Gonsalvez, C. J., & Polich, J. M. (2002) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201393137 · Cited by 285
Cortically coupled computer vision for rapid image search
Gerson, A. D., Parra, L. C., & Sajda, P. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2006.875550 · Cited by 258
Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing
Krauledat, M., Tangermann, M., Blankertz, B., & Müller, K. R. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002967 · Cited by 256
Invariant Common Spatial Patterns: Alleviating Nonstationarities in Brain-Computer Interfacing
Blankertz, B., Kawanabe, M., Tomioka, R., Hohlefeld, F. U., Nikulin, V. V., & Müller, K. R. (2008) · Cited by 214
N200-speller using motion-onset visual response
Hong, B., Guo, F., Liu, T., Gao, X., & Gao, S. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.06.026 · Cited by 194
Brunner, C., Naeem, M., Leeb, R., Graimann, B., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2007) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2007.01.002 · Cited by 187
Spelling with non-invasive Brain–Computer Interfaces – Current and future trends
Cecotti, H. (2011) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.08.003 · Cited by 177
Self-citationBrain Activity-Based Image Classification From Rapid Serial Visual Presentation
Bigdely-Shamlo, N., Vankov, A., Ramirez, R. R., & Makeig, S. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.2003381 · Cited by 177
A regularized discriminative framework for EEG analysis with application to brain–computer interface
Tomioka, R., & Müller, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.045 · Cited by 169
Spatiotemporal Linear Decoding of Brain State
Parra, L. C., Christoforou, C., Gerson, A. D., Dyrholm, M., Luo, A., Wagner, M., Philiastides, M. G., & Sajda, P. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408447 · Cited by 135
Arvaneh, M., Guan, C., Ang, K. K., & Quek, C. H. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2239310 · Cited by 133
A robust sensor-selection method for P300 brain–computer interfaces
Cecotti, H., Rivet, B., Congedo, M., Christian Jutten, B., Bertrand, O., Maby, E., & Mattout, J. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016001 · Cited by 106
Self-citationA novel brain-computer interface based on the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm
Acqualagna, L., Treder, M. S., Schreuder, M., & Blankertz, B. (2010) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5626548 · Cited by 104
fMRI Brain-Computer Interfaces
Sitaram, R., Weiskopf, N., Carìa, A., Veit, R., Erb, M., & Birbaumer, N. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408446 · Cited by 103
Pohlmeyer, E. A., Wang, J., Jangraw, D. C., Lou, B., Chang, S., & Sajda, P. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036025 · Cited by 85
Cecotti, H. (2011) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2011.02.022 · Cited by 80
Self-citationA framework for rapid visual image search using single-trial brain evoked responses
Huang, Y., Deniz Erdogmus, B., Pavel, M., Mathan, S. A., & Hild, K. E. (2011) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2010.12.025 · Cited by 78
Bayesian Learning for Spatial Filtering in an EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
Zhang, H., Yang, H., & Guan, C. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2249087 · Cited by 71
Sajda, P., Gerson, A. D., & Parra, L. C. (2003) · International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · doi:10.1109/cne.2003.1196297 · Cited by 54
Real-Time Measurement of Face Recognition in Rapid Serial Visual Presentation
Touryan, J., Gibson, L., Horne, J. H., & Weber, P. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00042 · Cited by 49
Single-trial detection in EEG and MEG: Keeping it linear
Parra, L. C., Alvino, C., Tang, A. C., Pearlmutter, B. A., Yeung, N., Osman, A. M., & Sajda, P. (2003) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(02)00821-4 · Cited by 47
Rivet, B., & Souloumiac, A. (2012) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.07.019 · Cited by 42
Incremental Common Spatial Pattern algorithm for BCI
Zhao, Q., Zhang, L., Cichocki, A. S., & Li, J. (2008) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4634170 · Cited by 35
Adapting Spatial Filter Methods for Nonstationary BCIs
Tomioka, R., Hill, J., Blankertz, B., & Aihara, K. (2006) · Cited by 32
Impact of Spatial Filters During Sensor Selection in a Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface
Rivet, B., Cecotti, H., Maby, E., & Mattout, J. (2011) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-011-0193-y · Cited by 30
Self-citationEEG-based brain-computer interface using subject-specific spatial filters
Pfurtscheller, G., Guger, C., & Ramoser, H. (1999) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/bfb0100491 · Cited by 27
The sixth annual MLSP competition, 2010
Hild, K. E., Kurimo, M., & Calhoun, V. D. (2010) · IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2010.5589227 · Cited by 19
MLSP Competition, 2010: Description of third place method.
Labbé, B., Tian, X., & Rakotomamonjy, A. (2010) · IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2010.5589242 · Cited by 10
MLSP Competition, 2010: Description of first place method
Leiva, J. M., & Martens, S. (2010) · IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP) · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2010.5589243 · Cited by 8
Combining computer and human vision into a BCI: Can the whole be greater than the sum of its parts?
Pohlmeyer, E. A., Jangraw, D. C., Wang, J., Chang, S.-F., & Sajda, P. (2010) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5627403 · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- golub, 1996, Matrix Computations
- sharbrough, 1990, Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c · Cited by 5,115
“We believe models that fall in (1), such as EEGNet and others [31, 33, 34], offer the best tradeoff between input dimensionality and the flexibility to discover relevant features by providing all available channels.”
MethodDeep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review
Roy, Y., Banville, H., Albuquerque, I., Gramfort, A., Falk, T. H., & Faubert, J. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab260c · Cited by 1,532
Learning Temporal Information for Brain-Computer Interface Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Sakhavi, S., Guan, C., & Yan, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2789927 · Cited by 660
EEG-Based Spatio–Temporal Convolutional Neural Network for Driver Fatigue Evaluation
Gao, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Mu, C., Cai, Q., Dang, W., & Zuo, S. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2886414 · Cited by 486
Lightweight Pyramid Networks for Image Deraining
Fu, X., Liang, B., Huang, Y., Ding, X., & Paisley, J. W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2926481 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Cecotti, H., Eckstein, M. P., & Giesbrecht, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Ulster (GB)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2030-2042
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2044310907
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.ulster.ac.uk
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies through the U.S. Army Research Office
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Keywords
- single-trial event-related potentials, rapid serial visual presentation, convolutional neural networks, AUC maximization, common spatial pattern, EEG classification, target detection, nonlinear classifiers, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Filtration, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, ROC Curve, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Visual Perception, Neural Networks, Computer, Area Under Curve, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
