The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Cost-Sensitive Deep Belief Network for Imbalanced Classification
Abstract
Imbalanced data with a skewed class distribution are common in many real-world applications. Deep Belief Network (DBN) is a machine learning technique that is effective in classification tasks. However, conventional DBN does not work well for imbalanced data classification because it assumes equal costs for each class. To deal with this problem, cost-sensitive approaches assign different misclassification costs for different classes without disrupting the true data sample distributions. However, due to lack of prior knowledge, the misclassification costs are usually unknown and hard to choose in practice. Moreover, it has not been well studied as to how cost-sensitive learning could improve DBN performance on imbalanced data problems. This paper proposes an evolutionary cost-sensitive deep belief network (ECS-DBN) for imbalanced classification. ECS-DBN uses adaptive differential evolution to optimize the misclassification costs based on the training data that presents an effective approach to incorporating the evaluation measure (i.e., G-mean) into the objective function. We first optimize the misclassification costs, and then apply them to DBN. Adaptive differential evolution optimization is implemented as the optimization algorithm that automatically updates its corresponding parameters without the need of prior domain knowledge. The experiments have shown that the proposed approach consistently outperforms the state of the art on both benchmark data sets and real-world data set for fault diagnosis in tool condition monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis
Berger, J. O. (1985) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2 · Cited by 7,722
ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning
He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E. A., & Li, S. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4633969 · Cited by 4,521
Borderline-SMOTE : A New Over-Sampling Method in Imbalanced Data Sets Learning
Han, H., Wang, W.-Y., & Mao, B.-H. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11538059_91 · Cited by 4,331
Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization
Yang, X.-S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04944-6_14 · Cited by 4,075
JADE: Adaptive Differential Evolution With Optional External Archive
Zhang, J., & Sanderson, A. C. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2009.2014613 · Cited by 3,739
Cited by
An Improved Quantum-Inspired Differential Evolution Algorithm for Deep Belief Network
Deng, W., Liu, H., Xu, J., Zhao, H., & Song, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.2983233 · Cited by 429
A survey of swarm and evolutionary computing approaches for deep learning
Darwish, A., Hassanien, A. E., & Das, S. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09719-2 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, C., Tan, K. C., Li, H., & Hong, G. S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-122
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2963596856
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 15.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Cost-Sensitive Deep Belief Network for Imbalanced Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2018.2832648
- The paper
- Zhang, C., Tan, K. C., Li, H., & Hong, G. S. (2019). A Cost-Sensitive Deep Belief Network for Imbalanced Classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2018.2832648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.