Deep decision tree transfer boosting
Abstract
Instance transfer approaches consider source and target data together during the training process, and borrow examples from the source domain to augment the training data, when there is limited or no label in the target domain. Among them, boosting-based transfer learning methods (e.g., TrAdaBoost) are most widely used. When dealing with more complex data, we may consider the more complex hypotheses (e.g., a decision tree with deeper layers). However, with the fixed and high complexity of the hypotheses, TrAdaBoost and its variants may face the overfitting problems. Even worse, in the transfer learning scenario, a decision tree with deep layers may overfit different distribution data in the source domain. In this paper, we propose a new instance transfer learning method, i.e., Deep Decision Tree Transfer Boosting (DTrBoost), whose weights are learned and assigned to base learners by minimizing the data-dependent learning bounds across both source and target domains in terms of the Rademacher complexities. This guarantees that we can learn decision trees with deep layers without overfitting. The theorem proof and experimental results indicate the effectiveness of our proposed method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DTs are prone to overfitting and sensitive to data perturbations, limiting generalizability.
“However, DTs are prone to overfitting and sensitive to data perturbations, limiting generalizability [113].”
From Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics (2026) · cites this paper as [113]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Jiang, S., Mao, H., Ding, Z., & Fu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 383-395
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2933295258
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Author eBooks
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1651902)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-17-1-0367)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- domain adaptation, boosting, TrAdaBoost, overfitting, Rademacher complexity, unlabeled target domain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review