Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition

Shu, Xiangbo, Zhang, Liyan, Sun, Yunlian, Tang, Jinhui·2021·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

This article aims to tackle the problem of group activity recognition in the multiple-person scene. To model the group activity with multiple persons, most long short-term memory (LSTM)-based methods first learn the person-level action representations by several LSTMs and then integrate all the person-level action representations into the following LSTM to learn the group-level activity representation. This type of solution is a two-stage strategy, which neglects the "host-parasite" relationship between the group-level activity ("host") and person-level actions ("parasite") in spatiotemporal space. To this end, we propose a novel graph LSTM-in-LSTM (GLIL) for group activity recognition by modeling the person-level actions and the group-level activity simultaneously. GLIL is a "host-parasite" architecture, which can be seen as several person LSTMs (P-LSTMs) in the local view or a graph LSTM (G-LSTM) in the global view. Specifically, P-LSTMs model the person-level actions based on the interactions among persons. Meanwhile, G-LSTM models the group-level activity, where the person-level motion information in multiple P-LSTMs is selectively integrated and stored into G-LSTM based on their contributions to the inference of the group activity class. Furthermore, to use the person-level temporal features instead of the person-level static features as the input of GLIL, we introduce a residual LSTM with the residual connection to learn the person-level residual features, consisting of temporal features and static features. Experimental results on two public data sets illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed GLIL compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Shu, X., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., & Tang, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2021-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
663-674
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W3014545861
Cited by
258
References
59
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942
The paper
Shu, X., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., & Tang, J. (2021). Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.