The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition
Abstract
This article aims to tackle the problem of group activity recognition in the multiple-person scene. To model the group activity with multiple persons, most long short-term memory (LSTM)-based methods first learn the person-level action representations by several LSTMs and then integrate all the person-level action representations into the following LSTM to learn the group-level activity representation. This type of solution is a two-stage strategy, which neglects the "host-parasite" relationship between the group-level activity ("host") and person-level actions ("parasite") in spatiotemporal space. To this end, we propose a novel graph LSTM-in-LSTM (GLIL) for group activity recognition by modeling the person-level actions and the group-level activity simultaneously. GLIL is a "host-parasite" architecture, which can be seen as several person LSTMs (P-LSTMs) in the local view or a graph LSTM (G-LSTM) in the global view. Specifically, P-LSTMs model the person-level actions based on the interactions among persons. Meanwhile, G-LSTM models the group-level activity, where the person-level motion information in multiple P-LSTMs is selectively integrated and stored into G-LSTM based on their contributions to the inference of the group activity class. Furthermore, to use the person-level temporal features instead of the person-level static features as the input of GLIL, we introduce a residual LSTM with the residual connection to learn the person-level residual features, consisting of temporal features and static features. Experimental results on two public data sets illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed GLIL compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Caffe: Convolutional Architecture for Fast Feature Embedding
Jia, Y., Shelhamer, E., Donahue, J., Karayev, S., Long, J., Girshick, R., Guadarrama, S., & Darrell, T. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2647868.2654889 · Cited by 11,077
3D Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Action Recognition
Ji, S., Xu, W., Yang, M., & Yu, K. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.59 · Cited by 6,235
A Learning Algorithm for Continually Running Fully Recurrent Neural Networks
Williams, R. J., & Zipser, D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.270 · Cited by 4,369
NTU RGB+D: A Large Scale Dataset for 3D Human Activity Analysis
Shahroudy, A., Liu, J., Ng, T.-T., & Wang, G. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.115 · Cited by 3,148
Cited by
Spatiotemporal Co-Attention Recurrent Neural Networks for Human-Skeleton Motion Prediction
Shu, X., Zhang, L., Qi, G.-J., Liu, W., & Tang, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3050918 · Cited by 276
Self-citationSkip-attention encoder–decoder framework for human motion prediction
Zhang, R., Shu, X., Yan, R., Zhang, J., & Song, Y. (2022) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-021-00807-4 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shu, X., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 663-674
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W3014545861
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942
- The paper
- Shu, X., Zhang, L., Sun, Y., & Tang, J. (2021). Host–Parasite: Graph LSTM-in-LSTM for Group Activity Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2020.2978942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.