Self-Supervised Random Forest on Transformed Distribution for Anomaly Detection
Open accessAbstract
Anomaly detection, the task of differentiating abnormal data points from normal ones, presents a significant challenge in the realm of machine learning. Numerous strategies have been proposed to tackle this task, with classification-based methods, specifically those utilizing a self-supervised approach via random affine transformations (RATs), demonstrating remarkable performance on both image and non-image data. However, these methods encounter a notable bottleneck, the overlap of constructed labeled datasets across categories, which hampers the subsequent classifiers' ability to detect anomalies. Consequently, the creation of an effective data distribution becomes the pivotal factor for success. In this article, we introduce a model called "self-supervised forest (sForest)," which leverages the random Fourier transform (RFT) and random orthogonal rotations to craft a controlled data distribution. Our model utilizes the RFT to map input data into a new feature space. With this transformed data, we create a self-labeled training dataset using random orthogonal rotations. We theoretically prove that the data distribution formulated by our methodology is more stable compared to one derived from RATs. We then use the self-labeled dataset in a random forest (RF) classifier to distinguish between normal and anomalous data points. Comprehensive experiments conducted on both real and artificial datasets illustrate that sForest outperforms other anomaly detection methods, including distance-based, kernel-based, forest-based, and network-based benchmarks.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The superior performance of RF may be attributed to its unique ability to handle feature importance, strong generalization, avoidance of overfitting, and proficiency in processing high-dimensional data.
“This superior performance may be attributed to unique ability to its unique ability to handle feature importance, strong generalization, avoidance of overfitting and proficiency in processing high-dimensional data (75, 76).”
From Machine learning-based risk predictive models for diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [75]
The Datasets results report that sForest outperformed baselines on three high-dimensional datasets, and the classifier comparison describes RF as competitive. But the paper attributes the high-dimensional gains partly to dimensionality reduction and does not establish that RF’s feature-importance handling, generalization, or avoidance of overfitting caused its superior performance. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- J. Liu, B. Wang, Z. Qi, Y. Tian, and Y. Shi, "Learning from label proportions with generative adversarial networks," in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.
- J. Liu et al., "LLP-GAN: A GAN-based algorithm for learning from label proportions," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 8377-8388, 2023.
- J. Mao, T. Wang, C. Jin, and A. Zhou, "Feature grouping-based outlier detection upon streaming trajectories," IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 2696-2709, Dec. 2017.
- P. Banerjee, P. Yawalkar, and S. Ranu, "MANTRA: A scalable approach to mining temporally anomalous sub-trajectories," in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, Aug. 2016, pp. 1415-1424.
- J. Mao, P. Sun, C. Jin, and A. Zhou, "Outlier detection over distributed trajectory streams," in Proc. SIAM Int. Conf. Data Mining, 2018, pp. 64-72.
- Y. Yuan, J. Fang, and Q. Wang, "Online anomaly detection in crowd scenes via structure analysis," IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 548-561, Mar. 2015.
- U. Fiore, A. De Santis, F. Perla, P. Zanetti, and F. Palmieri, "Using generative adversarial networks for improving classifi- cation effectiveness in credit card fraud detection," Inf. Sci., vol. 479, pp. 448-455, Apr. 2019.
- V. S. Tseng, J.-C. Ying, C.-W. Huang, Y. Kao, and K.-T. Chen, "FrauDetector: A graph-mining-based framework for fraudulent phone call detection," in Proc. 21st ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discovery Data Mining, Aug. 2015, pp. 2157-2166.
- Y.-H. Yoo, U.-H. Kim, and J.-H. Kim, "Recurrent reconstructive network for sequential anomaly detection," IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1704-1715, Mar. 2021.
- C. Yin, S. Zhang, J. Wang, and N. N. Xiong, "Anomaly detection based on convolutional recurrent autoencoder for IoT time series," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Syst., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 112-122, Jan. 2022.
- L. Li, J. Yan, H. Wang, and Y. Jin, "Anomaly detection of time series with smoothness-inducing sequential variational auto-encoder," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 1177-1191, Mar. 2021.
- T. Ergen and S. S. Kozat, "Unsupervised anomaly detection with LSTM neural networks," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 3127-3141, Aug. 2020.
- T. Schlegl, P. Seebock, S. M. Waldstein, U. Schmidterfurth, and G. Langs, "Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks to guide marker discovery," in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Process. Med. Imag., 2017, pp. 146-157.
- R. Chalapathy and S. Chawla, "Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey," 2019, arXiv:1901.03407. · arXiv
- H. Wang, M. J. Bah, and M. Hammad, "Progress in outlier detec- tion techniques: A survey," IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 107964-108000, 2019.
- I. Golan and R. El-Yaniv, "Deep anomaly detection using geomet- ric transformations," in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2018, pp. 9758-9769.
- J. Liu, Z. Qi, B. Wang, Y. Tian, and Y. Shi, "SELF-LLP: Self-supervised learning from label proportions with self-ensemble," Pattern Recognit., vol. 129, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 108767.
- C. Doersch, A. Gupta, and A. A. Efros, "Unsupervised visual rep- resentation learning by context prediction," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Santiago, Chile, Dec. 2015, pp. 1422-1430, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.167. · DOI · Paper page
- M. Noroozi and P. Favaro, "Unsupervised learning of visual represen- tations by solving jigsaw puzzles," in Computer Vision-ECCV 2016, vol. 9910. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Oct. 2016, pp. 69-84, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_5. · DOI · Paper page
- R. Zhang, P. Isola, and A. Efros, "Colorful image colorization," in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., vol. 9907. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, Oct. 2016, pp. 649-666, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319- 46487-9_40. · DOI
- D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, "A baseline for detecting mis- classified and out-of-distribution examples in neural networks," in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR). Toulon, France: OpenReview.net, Apr. 2017, pp. 1-12. [Online]. Available: https:// openreview.net/forum?id=Hkg4TI9xl
- L. Bergman and Y. Hoshen, "Classification-based anomaly detection for general data," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: OpenReview.net, Apr. 2020, pp. 1-12. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=H1lK_lBtvS
- A. Rahimi and B. Recht, "Random features for large-scale kernel machines," in Proc. NIPS, vol. 3, no. 4. Princeton, NJ, USA: Citeseer, 2007, p. 5.
- T. R. Bandaragoda, K. M. Ting, D. Albrecht, F. T. Liu, Y. Zhu, and J. R. Wells, "Isolation-based anomaly detection using nearest-neighbor ensembles," Comput. Intell., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 968-998, Nov. 2018.
- P. Gopalan, V. Sharan, and U. Wieder, "PIDForest: Anomaly detection via partial identification," in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2019, pp. 15783-15793.
- B. Zong et al., "Deep autoencoding Gaussian mixture model for unsu- pervised anomaly detection," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2018, pp. 1-19.
- X. Yang, L. J. Latecki, and D. Pokrajac, "Outlier detection with globally optimal exemplar-based GMM," in Proc. SIAM Int. Conf. Data Mining, Apr. 2009, pp. 145-154.
- Y. Liu, Z. Li, S. Pan, C. Gong, C. Zhou, and G. Karypis, "Anomaly detection on attributed networks via contrastive self-supervised learn- ing," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2378-2392, Jun. 2022.
- R. Blaser and P. Fryzlewicz, "Random rotation ensembles," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 126-151, 2016.
- F. Liu, X. Huang, Y. Chen, and J. A. K. Suykens, "Random features for kernel approximation: A survey on algorithms, theory, and beyond," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 7128-7148, Oct. 2022.
- L. Breiman, "Random forests," Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001.
- T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2009.
- M. M. Breunig, H.-P. Kriegel, R. T. Ng, and J. Sander, "LOF: Identifying density-based local outliers," ACM SIGMOD Rec., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 93-104, Jun. 2000.
- S. Ramaswamy, R. Rastogi, and K. Shim, "Efficient algorithms for mining outliers from large data sets," in Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. Manage. Data, May 2000, pp. 427-438.
- F. Angiulli and C. Pizzuti, "Fast outlier detection in high dimensional spaces," in Proc. Eur. Conf. Princ. Data Mining Knowl. Discovery. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2002, pp. 15-27.
- B. Schölkopf, J. C. Platt, J. Shawe-Taylor, A. J. Smola, and R. C. Williamson, "Estimating the support of a high-dimensional dis- tribution," Neural Comput., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1443-1471, Jul. 2001.
- Z. Li, Y. Zhao, N. Botta, C. Ionescu, and X. Hu, "COPOD: Copula- based outlier detection," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM), Nov. 2020, pp. 1118-1123.
- S. Larson et al., "An evaluation dataset for intent classification and out-of-scope prediction," in Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Lang. Process. 9th Int. Joint Conf. Natural Lang. Process. (EMNLP- IJCNLP), 2019, pp. 1311-1316.
- Y. Zheng, G. Chen, and M. Huang, "Out-of-domain detection for natural language understanding in dialog systems," IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process., vol. 28, pp. 1198-1209, 2020.
- A. Madry, A. Makelov, L. Schmidt, D. Tsipras, and A. Vladu, "Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2018, pp. 1-23. [Online]. Available: https://openreview.net/forum?id=rJzIBfZAb
- Authors
- Liu, J., Wang, H., Hang, H., Ma, S., Shen, X., & Shi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
- ModelBest Inc., Beijing, China
- University of Twente (NL)
- Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2025-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2675-2689
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W4391147937
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.utwente.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62306036, 62306159, 72231010, 71932008)
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research and Application for Data Science (2022B1212010006, R0400001-22)
- Guangdong Higher Education Upgrading Plan
- Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University United International College (UICR0700019-22)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- anomaly detection, self-supervised learning, random forest, data distribution, feature transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review