Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiation effects in SOI technologies

Schwank, J.R., Ferlet-Cavrois, V., Shaneyfelt, M.R., Paillet, P., Dodd, P.E.·2003·IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

Abstract

Silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technologies have been developed for radiation-hardened applications for many years and are rapidly becoming a main-stream commercial technology. The authors review the total dose, single-event effects, and dose rate hardness of SOI devices. The total dose response of SOI devices is more complex than for bulk-silicon devices due to the buried oxide. Radiation-induced trapped charge in the buried oxide can increase the leakage current of partially depleted transistors and decrease the threshold voltage and increase the leakage current of fully depleted transistors. Process techniques that reduce the net amount of radiation-induced positive charge trapped in the buried oxide and device design techniques that mitigate the effects of trapped charge in the buried oxide have been developed to harden SOI devices to bulk-silicon device levels. The sensitive volume for charge collection in SOI technologies is much smaller than for bulk-silicon devices potentially making SOI devices much harder to single-event upset (SEU). However, bipolar amplification caused by floating body effects can significantly reduce the SEU hardness of SOI devices. Body ties are used to reduce floating body effects and improve SEU hardness. SOI ICs are completely immune to classic four-layer p-n-p-n single-event latchup; however, floating body effects make SOI ICs susceptible to single-event snapback (single transistor latch). The sensitive volume for dose rate effects is typically two orders of magnitude lower for SOI devices than for bulk-silicon devices. By using body ties to reduce bipolar amplification, much higher dose rate upset levels can be achieved for SOI devices than for bulk-silicon devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tns.2003.812930

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Schwank, J. R., Ferlet-Cavrois, V., Shaneyfelt, M. R., Paillet, P., & Dodd, P. E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
Published
2003-06
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
522-538
ISSN
  • 0018-9499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1578
OpenAlex
W2116275715
Cited by
445
References
1
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation effects in SOI technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tns.2003.812930
The paper
Schwank, J. R., Ferlet-Cavrois, V., Shaneyfelt, M. R., Paillet, P., & Dodd, P. E. (2003). Radiation effects in SOI technologies. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2003.812930

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.