The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time of flight in PET revisited
Abstract
PET scanners based on LSO have the potential for significantly better coincidence timing resolution than the 6 ns FWHM typically achieved with BGO. This study analyzes the performance enhancements made possible by improved timing as a function of the coincidence time resolution. If 500 ps FWHM coincidence timing resolution can be achieved in a complete PET camera, the following four benefits can be realized for whole-body FDG imaging: 1) the random event rate can be reduced by using a narrower coincidence timing window, increasing the peak NECR by /spl sim/50%; 2) using time-of-flight (TOF) in the reconstruction algorithm will reduce the noise variance by a factor of 5; 3) emission and transmission data can be acquired simultaneously, reducing the total scan time; and 4) axial blurring can be reduced by using TOF to determine the correct axial plane of origin for each event. While TOF was extensively studied in the 1980s, practical factors limited its effectiveness at that time and little attention has been paid to timing in PET since then. As these potential improvements are substantial and the advent of LSO PET cameras gives us the means to obtain them without other sacrifices, efforts to improve PET timing should resume after their long dormancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges
Rahmim, A., & Zaidi, H. (2008) · Nuclear Medicine Communications · doi:10.1097/mnm.0b013e3282f3a515 · Cited by 834
Benefit of Time-of-Flight in PET: Experimental and Clinical Results
Karp, J. S., Surti, S., Daube-Witherspoon, M. E., & Muehllehner, G. (2008) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.044834 · Cited by 584
Performance Characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT System
van Sluis, J., de Jong, J., Schaar, J., Noordzij, W., van Snick, P., Dierckx, R., Borra, R., Willemsen, A., & Boellaard, R. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.215418 · Cited by 484
Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution
Conti, M. (2011) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1711-y · Cited by 335
Update on time-of-flight PET imaging
Surti, S. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.145029 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Moses, W. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1325-1330
- ISSN
- 0018-9499 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1578
- OpenAlex
- W2130040053
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time of flight in PET revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tns.2003.817319
- The paper
- Moses, W. W. (2003). Time of flight in PET revisited. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/tns.2003.817319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.