Cited by 100Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

DEEP-FEL: Decentralized, Efficient and Privacy-Enhanced Federated Edge Learning for Healthcare Cyber Physical Systems

Lian, Zhuotao, Yang, Qinglin, Wang, Weizheng, Zeng, Qingkui, Alazab, Mamoun, Zhao, Hong, Su, Chunhua·2022·IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

Abstract

The rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) stimulates the innovation for the health-related devices such as remote patient monitoring, connected inhalers and ingestible sensors. Simultaneously, with the aid of numerous equipments, a great number of collected data can be used for disease prediction or diagnosis model establishment. However, the potential patient data leak will also bring privacy and security issues in the interaction period. To deal with these existing issues, we propose a decentralized, efficient, and privacy-enhanced federated edge learning system called DEEP-FEL, which enables medical devices in different institutions to collaboratively train a global model without raw data mutual exchange. Firstly, we design a hierarchical ring topology to alleviate centralization of the conventional training framework, and formulate the ring construction as an optimization problem, which can be solved by an efficient heuristic algorithm. Subsequently, we design an efficient parameter aggregation algorithm for distributed medical institutions to generate a new global model, and the total amount of data transmitted by N nodes is only$2/N$times that of traditional algorithm. In addition, data security among different medical institutions is enhanced by adding artificial noise to the edge model. Finally, experimental results on three medical datasets demonstrate the superiority of our system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnse.2022.3175945

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 100

Authors
Lian, Z., Yang, Q., Wang, W., Zeng, Q., Alazab, M., Zhao, H., & Su, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Aizu (JP)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
  • Melbourne Polytechnic (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
Published
2022-09-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
3558-3569
ISSN
  • 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
  • 2334-329X
OpenAlex
W4290963548
Cited by
100
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5A2A03064391)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
federated edge learning, decentralized learning, patient data privacy, Internet of Medical Things, remote patient monitoring, parameter aggregation, artificial noise, data security, disease prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review