DEEP-FEL: Decentralized, Efficient and Privacy-Enhanced Federated Edge Learning for Healthcare Cyber Physical Systems
Abstract
The rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) stimulates the innovation for the health-related devices such as remote patient monitoring, connected inhalers and ingestible sensors. Simultaneously, with the aid of numerous equipments, a great number of collected data can be used for disease prediction or diagnosis model establishment. However, the potential patient data leak will also bring privacy and security issues in the interaction period. To deal with these existing issues, we propose a decentralized, efficient, and privacy-enhanced federated edge learning system called DEEP-FEL, which enables medical devices in different institutions to collaboratively train a global model without raw data mutual exchange. Firstly, we design a hierarchical ring topology to alleviate centralization of the conventional training framework, and formulate the ring construction as an optimization problem, which can be solved by an efficient heuristic algorithm. Subsequently, we design an efficient parameter aggregation algorithm for distributed medical institutions to generate a new global model, and the total amount of data transmitted by N nodes is only$2/N$times that of traditional algorithm. In addition, data security among different medical institutions is enhanced by adding artificial noise to the edge model. Finally, experimental results on three medical datasets demonstrate the superiority of our system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many blockchain algorithms are presented for IoMT to reduce the functionality of the central server, but no comparative analysis has been found.
“For instance, to reduce the functionality of the central server, many blockchain algorithms are presented for IoMT, but no comparative analysis has been found.”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [80]
The lack of comparative analysis of blockchain algorithms for IoMT is mainly due to each algorithm being deployed under a different model specification, such as dataset and application-specific.
“This is mainly due to the fact that each algorithm is deployed under a different model specification, such as dataset and application-specific [80].”
From Federated Learning for Privacy Preservation in Smart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [80]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Lian, Z., Yang, Q., Wang, W., Zeng, Q., Alazab, M., Zhao, H., & Su, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Aizu (JP)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
- Melbourne Polytechnic (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2022-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3558-3569
- ISSN
- 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-329X
- OpenAlex
- W4290963548
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A5A2A03064391)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- federated edge learning, decentralized learning, patient data privacy, Internet of Medical Things, remote patient monitoring, parameter aggregation, artificial noise, data security, disease prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review