Retracted: Blockchain and Deep Learning for Secure Communication in Digital Twin Empowered Industrial IoT Network
Open accessAbstract
The rapid expansion of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) necessitates the digitization of industrial processes in order to increase network efficiency. The integration of Digital Twin (DT) with IIoT digitizes physical objects into virtual representations to improve data analytics performance. Nevertheless, DT empowered IIoT generates a massive amount of data that is mostly sent to the cloud or edge servers for real-time analysis. However, unreliable public communication channels and lack of trust among participating entities causes various types of threats and attacks on the ongoing communication. Motivated from the aforementioned discussion, we present a blockchain and Deep Learning (DL) integrated framework for delivering decentralized data processing and learning in IIoT network. The framework first present a new DT model that facilitates construction of a virtual environment to simulate and replicate security-critical processes of IIoT. Second, we propose a blockchain-based data transmission scheme that uses smart contracts to ensure integrity and authenticity of data. Finally, the DL scheme is designed to apply the Intrusion Detection System (IDS) against valid data retrieved from blockchain. In DL scheme, a Long Short Term Memory-Sparse AutoEncoder (LSTMSAE) technique is proposed to learn the spatial-temporal representation. The extracted characteristics are further used by the proposed Multi-Head Self-Attention (MHSA)-based Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) algorithm to learn long-distance features and accurately detect attacks. The practical implementation of our proposed framework proves considerable enhancement of communication security and data privacy in DT empowered IIoT network.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In [112], an innovative IIoT network empowered by DT technology was introduced.
“In [112], an innovative IIoT network empowered by DT technology was introduced.”
From Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Kumar, P., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Franklin, A. A., Garg, S., & Singh, S.
- Affiliations
- Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
- Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
- Resilient Machine Learning Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Ultra I&C Communications, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2023-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2802-2813
- ISSN
- 2327-4697 (ISSN-L)
- 2334-329X
- OpenAlex
- W4285818425
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 23.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- retraction (2025-06-26)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Archive of Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad) (acceptedVersion)
- LUTPub (LUT University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- TiHAN Faculty Fellowship
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- blockchain, deep learning, digital twin, Industrial Internet of Things, secure communication, intrusion detection, smart contracts, data integrity, multi-head self-attention, bidirectional GRU, data privacy, decentralized data processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review