Cited by 1Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)

Beyond Liability: Decentralized Forensics for Autonomous Vehicle Events via a Redactable Blockchain Approach

Guo, Hao, Li, Wanxin, Meese, Collin, Wang, Yetong, Nejad, Mark·2025·IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can sense their environment and navigate without human input. However, when AVs are involved in accidents with other AVs or human subjects, liability must be indisputably determined based on accident forensics. However, existing methods rely on centralized authorities to collect and manage accident data, making them vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks (e.g., tampering, denial-of-service). Decentralized systems, such as blockchain networks, present a promising alternative; however, their data immutability properties present challenges in practice. Consequently, this paper introduces a redactable blockchain solution for vehicular event forensics. This novel approach, underpinned by a decentralized attribute-based chameleon hash function, supports modifying data from multiple blocks, as well as individual transaction-level modification operations, without the issue of a single point of failure. We implemented the proposed system using the Charm cryptography library and the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain platform. The Chameleon hash function can support redactable operations for on-chain vehicular event records with a latency of seconds. We also conducted extensive experiments on blockchain performance and the witness group formation cost, highlighting that the proposed redactable blockchain is efficient in practice for vehicular event forensics tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsm.2025.3619069

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, H., Li, W., Meese, C., Wang, Y., & Nejad, M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
  • University of Delaware (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
Published
2025-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
5390-5403
ISSN
  • 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7379
OpenAlex
W4414955877
Cited by
0
References
35
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (2025JC-YBMS-688)
  • Key R&D Programs of Taicang, 2024 (TC2024SF10)
  • XJTLU Research Development Fund (RDF-22-02-106)
  • Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Youth Talent Promotion Program (JSTJ-2025-144)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, redactable blockchain, chameleon hash, attribute-based cryptography, decentralized data management, liability determination, Hyperledger Fabric, blockchain performance, tamper resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review