Cited by 44Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSpinal Cord Injury Research

Performance of epimysial stimulating electrodes in the lower extremities of individuals with spinal cord injury

Uhlir, J.P., Triolo, R.J., Davis, J.A., Bieri, C.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

This study describes the performance of surgically-implanted epimysial stimulating electrodes in the muscles of the lower extremities for use in functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) systems for standing after spinal cord injury. A total of 86 epimysial electrodes were implanted in 13 volunteers with low tetraplegia or paraplegia receiving the Case Western Reserve University/Veteran Affairs (CWRU/VA)-implanted standing/transfer neuroprosthesis. The neuroprosthesis consisted of bilateral epimysial electrodes in the knee and hip extensors (vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, and adductor magnus or semimembranosus) and intramuscular electrodes at the T12/L1 or L1/L2 spinal roots for trunk extension. Recruitment properties, stimulated knee and hip extension moments, standing performance, and mechanical integrity over time were measured for a period up to four years post-implantation. Stimulated thresholds were stable and recruitment was sufficient to generate joint moments adequate for standing, with up to 97% body weight supported by the legs. Four mechanical failures were observed, all in the posterior muscles of the thigh, leaving 95% of all electrodes operational at all followup intervals. Probability of 24-month survival is estimated to be 93% plateauing to a steady state of 90% at four years. These results indicate that epimysial designs are appropriate for long-term clinical use in the large muscles of the lower extremities with implanted motor system neuroprostheses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2004.827224

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 44

Authors
Uhlir, J. P., Triolo, R. J., Davis, J. A., & Bieri, C.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland FES Center (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2004-06
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
279-287
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2160056168
Cited by
44
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
spinal cord injury, functional electrical stimulation, neural prostheses, lower limb muscles, vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, intramuscular electrodes, trunk extension, equipment failure, stimulation threshold, muscle recruitment, body weight support
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Microelectrodes, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Stress, Mechanical, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque, Equipment Failure Analysis, Lower Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review