Performance of epimysial stimulating electrodes in the lower extremities of individuals with spinal cord injury
Abstract
This study describes the performance of surgically-implanted epimysial stimulating electrodes in the muscles of the lower extremities for use in functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) systems for standing after spinal cord injury. A total of 86 epimysial electrodes were implanted in 13 volunteers with low tetraplegia or paraplegia receiving the Case Western Reserve University/Veteran Affairs (CWRU/VA)-implanted standing/transfer neuroprosthesis. The neuroprosthesis consisted of bilateral epimysial electrodes in the knee and hip extensors (vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, and adductor magnus or semimembranosus) and intramuscular electrodes at the T12/L1 or L1/L2 spinal roots for trunk extension. Recruitment properties, stimulated knee and hip extension moments, standing performance, and mechanical integrity over time were measured for a period up to four years post-implantation. Stimulated thresholds were stable and recruitment was sufficient to generate joint moments adequate for standing, with up to 97% body weight supported by the legs. Four mechanical failures were observed, all in the posterior muscles of the thigh, leaving 95% of all electrodes operational at all followup intervals. Probability of 24-month survival is estimated to be 93% plateauing to a steady state of 90% at four years. These results indicate that epimysial designs are appropriate for long-term clinical use in the large muscles of the lower extremities with implanted motor system neuroprostheses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Epimysial electrodes have been found suitable and reliable in both upper and lower extremity applications in various clinical studies.
“It has been found suitable and reliable in both upper and lower extremity applications in various clinical studies [27, 28].”
From Interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of a neuroprosthetic limb: a review (2020) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Uhlir, J. P., Triolo, R. J., Davis, J. A., & Bieri, C.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland FES Center (US)
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- ORCID
- Triolo, R.J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-287
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2160056168
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- NIH Clinical Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, functional electrical stimulation, neural prostheses, lower limb muscles, vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, intramuscular electrodes, trunk extension, equipment failure, stimulation threshold, muscle recruitment, body weight support
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Microelectrodes, Middle Aged, Muscle Contraction, Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries, Stress, Mechanical, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque, Equipment Failure Analysis, Lower Extremity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review