The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces
Abstract
The measurement of ground reaction forces is important in the biomechanical analysis of gait and other motor activities. Many applications require full ambulatory measurement of these forces, but this is not supported by current measurement systems. We propose the use of two six-degrees-of-freedom force and moment sensors under each shoe, which enables the ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces and centers of pressure (CoP). The feasibility of this method is illustrated by experimental results in a healthy subject, using a force plate as a reference. The ground reaction forces and CoP recordings show good correspondence when they are evaluated for forces above 40 N and when it is simply assumed that the sensors are flat on the ground when they are loaded. The root mean square (rms) difference of the magnitude of the ground reaction force over 12 gait trials was 15 +/- 2 N, corresponding to 1.9 +/- 0.3% of the maximum ground reaction force magnitude. The rms difference of the horizontal component of the ground reaction force was 3 +/- 2 N, corresponding to 0.4 +/- 0.2% of the maximum ground reaction force magnitude and to 2 +/- 1% of the maximum of the horizontal component of the ground reaction force. The rms distance between both CoP recordings is 2.9 +/- 0.4 mm, corresponding to 1.1 +/- 0.2% of the length of the shoe, when the trajectories are optimally aligned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques
Preece, S. J., Goulermas, J. Y., Kenney, L. P. J., Howard, D., Meijer, K., & Crompton, R. (2009) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/30/4/r01 · Cited by 600
Heart rate measurement based on a time-lapse image.
Takano, C., & Ohta, Y. (2007) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.09.006 · Cited by 345
Ambulatory Position and Orientation Tracking Fusing Magnetic and Inertial Sensing
Roetenberg, D., Slycke, P. J., & Veltink, P. H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.889184 · Cited by 334
Self-citationCao, J., Xie, S. Q., Das, R., & Zhu, G. L. (2014) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.08.005 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Veltink, P. H., Liedtke, C., Droog, E., & van der Kooij, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 423-427
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2800390133
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2005.847359
- The paper
- Veltink, P. H., Liedtke, C., Droog, E., & van der Kooij, H. (2005). Ambulatory measurement of ground reaction forces. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2005.847359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.