Active sensing of target location encoded by cortical microstimulation
Abstract
Cortical microstimulation has been proposed as a method to deliver sensory percepts to circumvent damaged sensory receptors or pathways. However, much of perception involves the active movement of sensory organs and the integration of information across sensory and motor modalities. The efficacy of cortical microstimulation in such an active sensing paradigm has not been demonstrated. We report a novel behavioral paradigm which delivers microstimulation in real-time based on a rat's movements and show that rats can perform sensorimotor integration with electrically delivered stimuli. Using a real-time whisker tracking system, we delivered microstimulation in barrel cortex of actively whisking rats when their whisker crossed a particular spatial location which defined the target. Rats learned to integrate microstimulation cues with their knowledge of whisker position to infer target location along the rostro-caudal axis in less than 200 ms. In a separate experiment, we found that rats trained to respond to cortical microstimulation responded similarly to whisker deflections while ignoring auditory distracters, suggesting that barrel cortex stimulation may be perceptually similar to somatosensory stimuli. This ability to deliver sensory percepts using cortical microstimulation in an active sensing system might have significant implications for the development of sensorimotor neuroprostheses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In rodents, ICMS to barrel cortex using micro-wires generated artificial tactile percepts that allowed navigation around a virtual target on screen.
“In one study on rodents, the implementation of a biomimetic approach was tested by applying ICMS to the barrel cortex using micro-wires for the generation of artificial tactile percepts to navigate around a virtual target on the screen (Venkatraman and Carmena, 2011; O'Connor et al., 2013).”
From Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. (2017) · cites this paper as Venkatraman and Carmena, 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Venkatraman, S., & Carmena, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Qualcomm (United States) (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- ORCID
- Carmena, Jose M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-324
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2034943012
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- active sensing, sensorimotor integration, barrel cortex, whisker deflection, sensory substitution, rat behavior
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cerebral Cortex, Computer Systems, Electric Stimulation, Female, Microelectrodes, Movement, Neural Pathways, Physical Stimulation, Prosthesis Design, Sensory Receptor Cells, Somatosensory Cortex, Space Perception, Vibrissae, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Head Movements, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review