Cited by 63Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Experimental Validation of a Hybrid Computational Model for Selective Stimulation Using Transverse Intrafascicular Multichannel Electrodes

Open access
Raspopovic, Stanisa, Capogrosso, Marco, Badia, Jordi, Navarro, Xavier, Micera, Silvestro·2012·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Recently a hybrid model based on the finite element method and on a compartmental biophysical representation of peripheral nerve fibers and intraneural electrodes was developed founded on experimental physiological and histological data. The model appeared to be robust when dealing with uncertainties in parameter selection. However, an experimental validation of the findings provided by the model is required to fully characterize the potential of this approach. The recruitment properties of selective nerve stimulation using transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes (TIME) were investigated in this work in experiments with rats and were compared to model predictions. Animal experiments were performed using the same stimulation protocol as in the computer simulations in order to rigorously validate the model predictions and understand its limitations. Two different selectivity indexes were used, and new indexes for measuring electrode performance are proposed. The model predictions are in decent agreement with experimental results both in terms of recruitment curves and selectivity values. Results show that these models can be used for extensive studies targeting electrode shape design, active sites shape, and multipolar stimulation paradigms. From a neurophysiological point of view, the topographic organization of the rat sciatic nerve, on which the model was based, has been confirmed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2012.2189021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 63

Authors
Raspopovic, S., Capogrosso, M., Badia, J., Navarro, X., & Micera, S.
Affiliations
  • Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2012-05
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
395-404
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2136104363
Cited by
63
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
selective nerve stimulation, hybrid computational model, finite element analysis, peripheral nerve fibers, sciatic nerve, recruitment curves, selectivity index, rats
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Biophysics, Computer Simulation, Computers, Hybrid, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Sciatic Nerve, Reproducibility of Results, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Muscle, Skeletal, Finite Element Analysis, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review