Improved Neural Signal Classification in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task Using Active Learning
Open accessAbstract
The application space for brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies is rapidly expanding with improvements in technology. However, most real-time BCIs require extensive individualized calibration prior to use, and systems often have to be recalibrated to account for changes in the neural signals due to a variety of factors including changes in human state, the surrounding environment, and task conditions. Novel approaches to reduce calibration time or effort will dramatically improve the usability of BCI systems. Active Learning (AL) is an iterative semi-supervised learning technique for learning in situations in which data may be abundant, but labels for the data are difficult or expensive to obtain. In this paper, we apply AL to a simulated BCI system for target identification using data from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) paradigm to minimize the amount of training samples needed to initially calibrate a neural classifier. Our results show AL can produce similar overall classification accuracy with significantly less labeled data (in some cases less than 20%) when compared to alternative calibration approaches. In fact, AL classification performance matches performance of 10-fold cross-validation (CV) in over 70% of subjects when training with less than 50% of the data. To our knowledge, this is the first work to demonstrate the use of AL for offline electroencephalography (EEG) calibration in a simulated BCI paradigm. While AL itself is not often amenable for use in real-time systems, this work opens the door to alternative AL-like systems that are more amenable for BCI applications and thus enables future efforts for developing highly adaptive BCI systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 64
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- S. Tong and D. Koller, "Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 2, pp. 45-66, 2002.
- E. A. Pohlmeyer et al., "Closing the loop in cortically-coupled computer vision: A brain-Computer interface for searching image databases," J. Neural Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 036025, 2011.
- D.-H. Lee, "Pseudo-label: The simple and efficient semi-supervised learning method for deep neural networks," presented at the ICML 2013 Workshop : Challenges in Representation Learning (WREPL), Atlanta, GA, 2013.
- P. Sajda et al., "In a blink of an eye and a switch of a transistor: Cortically coupled computer vision," Proc. IEEE, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 462-478, Mar. 2010.
- R. Parasuraman, "Sustained attention in detection and discrimination," in Varieties of Attention, 2nd ed. New York: Academic, 1984, pp. 243-271.
- Dongrui Wu (S'05-M'09-SM'14) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, in 2009. He was a Lead Research Engineer at GE Global Research 2010-2015. Now he is Founder and Chief Scientist of DataNova. His research interests include affective computing, computational intelligence, and machine learning. He has over 80 publica- tions, including a book "Perceptual Computing" (Wiley-IEEE, 2010).
- Dr. Wu is an Associate Editor of IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS and IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS.
- Authors
- Marathe, A. R., Lawhern, V. J., Wu, D., Slayback, D., & Lance, B. J.
- Affiliations
- DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-343
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2177405552
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of the Secretary of Defense (Autonomy Research Pilot Initiative MIPR DWAM31168)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- active learning (machine learning), brain-computer interface, rapid serial visual presentation, neural signal classification, target identification, semi-supervised learning
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Algorithms, Calibration, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review