Regularized Speaker Adaptation of KL-HMM for Dysarthric Speech Recognition
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses the problem of recognizing the speech uttered by patients with dysarthria, which is a motor speech disorder impeding the physical production of speech. Patients with dysarthria have articulatory limitation, and therefore, they often have trouble in pronouncing certain sounds, resulting in undesirable phonetic variation. Modern automatic speech recognition systems designed for regular speakers are ineffective for dysarthric sufferers due to the phonetic variation. To capture the phonetic variation, Kullback-Leibler divergence-based hidden Markov model (KL-HMM) is adopted, where the emission probability of state is parameterized by a categorical distribution using phoneme posterior probabilities obtained from a deep neural network-based acoustic model. To further reflect speaker-specific phonetic variation patterns, a speaker adaptation method based on a combination of L2 regularization and confusion-reducing regularization, which can enhance discriminability between categorical distributions of the KL-HMM states while preserving speaker-specific information is proposed. Evaluation of the proposed speaker adaptation method on a database of several hundred words for 30 speakers consisting of 12 mildly dysarthric, 8 moderately dysarthric, and 10 non-dysarthric control speakers showed that the proposed approach significantly outperformed the conventional deep neural network-based speaker adapted system on dysarthric as well as non-dysarthric speech.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [37]Hinton G Deng L Yu D Dahl GE Mohamed A Jaitly N Senior A Vanhoucke V Ngugen P Sainath TN Kingsbury B Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition IEEE Signal Process Mag 29 6 82 97 11 2012
- Authors
- Kim, M., Kim, Y., Yoo, J., Wang, J., & Kim, H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1581-1591
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- PMC
- PMC5591083
- OpenAlex
- W2595767284
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2014R1A2A2A01007650)
- National Institutes of Health (R03DC013990)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- dysarthria, dysarthric speech recognition, speaker adaptation, Kullback-Leibler divergence, hidden Markov models, phonetic variation, Tikhonov regularization, categorical distributions, deep neural network acoustic models, motor speech disorders
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Algorithms, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Computer Simulation, Dysarthria, Female, Humans, Male, Markov Chains, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Speech Production Measurement, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review