Cited by 76EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis

Modeling EEG data distribution with a wasserstein generative adversarial network to predict RSVP events.

Open access
Panwar, Sharaj, Rad, Paul, Jung, Tzyy-Ping, Huang, Yufei·2020·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) data are difficult to obtain due to complex experimental setups and reduced comfort with prolonged wearing. This poses challenges to train powerful deep learning model with the limited EEG data. Being able to generate EEG data computationally could address this limitation. We propose a novel Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) to synthesize EEG data. This network addresses several modeling challenges of simulating time-series EEG data including frequency artifacts and training instability. We further extended this network to a class-conditioned variant that also includes a classification branch to perform event-related classification. We trained the proposed networks to generate one and 64-channel data resembling EEG signals routinely seen in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) experiment and demonstrated the validity of the generated samples. We also tested intra-subject cross-session classification performance for classifying the RSVP target events and showed that class-conditioned WGAN-GP can achieve improved event-classification performance over EEGNet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2020.3006180

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WGAN with gradient penalty DA obtained significant improvement based on the EEGNet model in the RSVP task.

    “Experiments show that presentation-associated patterns of EEG could be seen clearly in generated data and they obtained significant improvement based on the EEGNet model after DA in the RSVP task (Lawhern et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panwar, S., Rad, P., Jung, T.-P., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2020-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
1720-1730
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W3040218637
Cited by
76
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-10-2-0022)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Keywords
Wasserstein GAN with gradient penalty, rapid serial visual presentation
MeSH terms
Electroencephalography, Humans, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review