Cited by 10Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersPain Management and Treatment

Real-Time Optimization of Retinal Ganglion Cell Spatial Activity in Response to Epiretinal Stimulation

Open access
Haji Ghaffari, Dorsa, Akwaboah, Akwasi Darkwah, Mirzakhalili, Ehsan, Weiland, James D.·2021·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Retinal prostheses aim to improve visual perception in patients blinded by photoreceptor degeneration. However, shape and letter perception with these devices is currently limited due to low spatial resolution. Previous research has shown the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) spatial activity and phosphene shapes can vary due to the complexity of retina structure and electrode-retina interactions. Visual percepts elicited by single electrodes differ in size and shapes for different electrodes within the same subject, resulting in interference between phosphenes and an unclear image. Prior work has shown that better patient outcomes correlate with spatially separate phosphenes. In this study we use calcium imaging, in vitro retina, neural networks (NN), and an optimization algorithm to demonstrate a method to iteratively search for optimal stimulation parameters that create focal RGC activation. Our findings indicate that we can converge to stimulation parameters that result in focal RGC activation by sampling less than 1/3 of the parameter space. A similar process implemented clinically can reduce time required for optimizing implant operation and enable personalized fitting of retinal prostheses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2021.3138297

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These approaches supported optimization of the stimulation parameters with neural networks and a genetic algorithm, respectively.

    “These approaches supported optimization of the stimulation parameters with neural networks and a genetic algorithm, respectively.”
  • Two studies were evaluated in a mouse model involving the transduction of a calcium indicator and electrophysiological measurements in RGCs to provide an objective measurement of their activity.

    “Two studies were evaluated in a mouse model involving the transduction of a calcium indicator94 and electrophysiological measurements93 in RGCs to provide an objective measurement of their activity.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 10

Authors
Haji Ghaffari, D., Akwaboah, A. D., Mirzakhalili, E., & Weiland, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2021
Volume
29
Pages
2733-2741
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W4200184177
Cited by
10
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 Award (EY013934)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, epiretinal stimulation, retinal ganglion cells, stimulation parameter optimization, calcium imaging, visual perception
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation, Humans, Phosphenes, Retina, Retinal Degeneration, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review