Automatic Detection and Assessment of Freezing of Gait Manifestations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Freezing of gait (FOG) is an episodic and highly disabling symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although described as a single phenomenon, FOG is heterogeneous and can express as different manifestations, such as trembling in place or complete akinesia. We aimed to analyze the efficacy of deep learning (DL) trained on inertial measurement unit data to classify FOG into both manifestations. We adapted and compared four state-of-the-art FOG detection algorithms for this task and investigated the advantages of incorporating a refinement model to address oversegmentation errors. We evaluated the model's performance in distinguishing between trembling and akinesia, as well as other forms of movement cessation (e.g., stopping and sitting), against gold-standard video annotations. Experiments were conducted on a dataset of eighteen PD patients completing a FOG-provoking protocol in a gait laboratory. Results showed our model achieved an F1 score of 0.78 and segment F1@50 of 0.75 in detecting FOG manifestations. Assessment of FOG severity was strong for trembling (ICC=0.86, [0.66,0.95]) and moderately strong for akinesia (ICC=0.78, [0.51,0.91]). Importantly, our model successfully differentiated FOG from other forms of movement cessation during 360-degree turning-in-place tasks. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that DL can accurately assess different types of FOG manifestations, warranting further investigation in larger and more diverse verification cohorts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965 · see citing works
Temporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detection
Lea, C., Flynn, M. D., Vidal, R., Reiter, A., & Hager, G. D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.113 · Cited by 2,238 · cited 3× · see citing works
“wise F1 score [38], which effectively penalizes such errors.”
BackgroundMethodStudent (1908) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/6.1.1 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Wearable Assistant for Parkinson’s Disease Patients With the Freezing of Gait Symptom
Bachlin, M., Plotnik, M., Roggen, D., Maidan, I., Hausdorff, J. M., Giladi, N., & Troster, G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2009.2036165 · Cited by 693 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, introduced an energy threshold and stride features, which were combined with the FI to identify FOG episodes [20], [21].”
MethodMS-TCN: Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network for Action Segmentation
Farha, Y. A., & Gall, J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00369 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease
Moore, S. T., MacDougall, H. G., & Ondo, W. G. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.023 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Rodríguez-Martín, D., Samà, A., Pérez-López, C., Català, A., Moreno Arostegui, J. M., Cabestany, J., Bayés, À., Alcaine, S., Mestre, B., Prats, A., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171764 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yang, P.-K., Filtjens, B., Ginis, P., Goris, M., Nieuwboer, A., Gilat, M., Slaets, P., & Vanrumste, B.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Po-Kai
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 2699-2708
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W4400810455
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Development of the Freezing of Gait Interactive Tagging (FOG-IT) Project from KU Leuven (C3/20/109)
- Ministry of Education (KU Leuven-Taiwan) Scholarship
- KU Leuven Internal Funds Post-Doctoral Mandate (PDMT2/22/046)
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1SHEK24N)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- freezing of gait, Parkinson's disease, deep learning, inertial measurement unit, fog detection, akinesia, video annotation
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Aged, Algorithms, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Video Recording, Gait Disorders, Neurologic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review