The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations
Abstract
This paper introduces a general purpose performance measurement scheme for image segmentation algorithms. Performance parameters that function in real-time distinguish this method from previous approaches that depended on an a priori knowledge of the correct segmentation. A low level, context independent definition of segmentation is used to obtain a set of optimization criteria for evaluating performance. Uniformity within each region and contrast between adjacent regions serve as parameters for region analysis. Contrast across lines and connectivity between them represent measures for line analysis. Texture is depicted by the introduction of focus of attention areas as groups of regions and lines. The performance parameters are then measured separately for each area. The usefulness of this approach lies in the ability to adjust the strategy of a system according to the varying characteristics of different areas. This feedback path provides the means for more efficient and error-free processing. Results from areas with dissimilar properties show a diversity in the measurements that is utilized for dynamic strategy setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods
Zhang, H., Fritts, J. E., & Goldman, S. A. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.08.003 · Cited by 963
Unsupervised Performance Evaluation of Image Segmentation
Chabrier, S., Emile, B., Rosenberger, C., & Laurent, H. (2006) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1155/asp/2006/96306 · Cited by 136
New benchmark for image segmentation evaluation
Ge, F., Wang, S., & Liu, T. (2007) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.2762250 · Cited by 108
Stand-Alone Objective Segmentation Quality Evaluation
Correia, P. L., & Pereira, F. (2002) · EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing · doi:10.1155/s1110865702000707 · Cited by 35
Meta-Evaluation of Image Segmentation Using Machine Learning
Zhang, H., Cholleti, S., Goldman, S. A., & Fritts, J. E. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 1 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.185 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, M. D., & Nazif, A. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- PAMI-7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-164
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051084846
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.1985.4767640
- The paper
- Levine, M. D., & Nazif, A. M. (1985). Dynamic Measurement of Computer Generated Image Segmentations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.1985.4767640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.