The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simple Parallel Hierarchical and Relaxation Algorithms for Segmenting Noncausal Markovian Random Fields
Abstract
The modeling and segmentation of images by MRF's (Markov random fields) is treated. These are two-dimensional noncausal Markovian stochastic processes. Two conceptually new algorithms are presented for segmenting textured images into regions in each of which the data are modeled as one of C MRF's. The algorithms are designed to operate in real time when implemented on new parallel computer architectures that can be built with present technology. A doubly stochastic representation is used in image modeling. Here, a Gaussian MRF is used to model textures in visible light and infrared images, and an autobinary (or autoternary, etc.) MRF to model a priori information about the local geometry of textured image regions. For image segmentation, the true texture class regions are treated either as a priori completely unknown or as a realization of a binary (or ternary, etc.) MRF. In the former case, image segmentation is realized as true maximum likelihood estimation. In the latter case, it is realized as true maximum a posteriori likelihood segmentation. In addition to providing a mathematically correct means for introducing geometric structure, the autobinary (or ternary, etc.) MRF can be used in a generative mode to generate image geometries and artificial images, and such simulations constitute a very powerful tool for studying the effects of these models and the appropriate choice of model parameters. The first segmentation algorithm is hierarchical and uses a pyramid-like structure in new ways that exploit the mutual dependencies among disjoint pieces of a textured region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions
BESAG, J., & KOOPERBERG, C. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.733 · Cited by 732
Statistical approach to segmentation of single-channel cerebral MR images
Rajapakse, J. C., Giedd, J. N., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563663 · Cited by 678
van Enter, A. C. D., Fernández, R., & Sokal, A. D. (1993) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01048183 · Cited by 401
The mean field theory in EM procedures for Markov random fields
Zhang, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.157297 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, F. S., & Cooper, D. B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- PAMI-9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-219
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022545622
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simple Parallel Hierarchical and Relaxation Algorithms for Segmenting Noncausal Markovian Random Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.1987.4767895
- The paper
- Cohen, F. S., & Cooper, D. B. (1987). Simple Parallel Hierarchical and Relaxation Algorithms for Segmenting Noncausal Markovian Random Fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.1987.4767895
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.