Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scene Segmentation from Visual Motion Using Global Optimization

Murray, David W., Buxton, Bernard F.·1987·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

This paper presents results from computer experiments with an algorithm to perform scene disposition and motion segmentation from visual motion or optic flow. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) criterion is used to formulate what the best segmentation or interpretation of the scene should be, where the scene is assumed to be made up of some fixed number of moving planar surface patches. The Bayesian approach requires, first, specification of prior expectations for the optic flow field, which here is modeled as spatial and temporal Markov random fields; and, secondly, a way of measuring how well the segmentation predicts the measured flow field. The Markov random fields incorporate the physical constraints that objects and their images are probably spatially continuous, and that their images are likely to move quite smoothly across the image plane. To compute the flow predicted by the segmentation, a recent method for reconstructing the motion and orientation of planar surface facets is used. The search for the globally optimal segmentation is performed using simulated annealing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.1987.4767896

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1016/0167-8655(86)90028-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0262-8856(86)90056-9 · DOI
  3. buxton, 1983, Monocular depth perception from optical flow by space time signal processing, Proc Roy Soc London B, 218, 27, 10.1098/rspb.1983.0024 · DOI
  4. murray, 1984, Reconstructing the optic flow field from edge motion: An examination of two different approaches, Proc First Conf Artif Intell Applications, 382
  5. 10.1016/0010-4655(85)90162-6 · DOI
  6. kearney, 1984, Gradient-based estimation of optical flow with global optimization, Proc First Conf Artif Intell Applications, 376
  7. marroquin, 1984, Surface Reconstruction Preserving Discontinuities
  8. kirkpatrick, 1983, Optimisation by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671, 10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0262-8856(84)90001-5 · DOI
  10. 10.1068/p090253 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/293133a0 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767471 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1109/TCSI.2004.836856 · DOI
  14. buxton, 1984, 3D solutions to the aperture problem, ?roc 6th European Conf Artif Intell, 631
  15. 10.1177/027836498500400307 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/027836498500400306 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TPAMI.1980.6447701 · DOI
  18. neumann, 1980, Motion analysis of image sequences for object grouping and reconstruction, Proc Pattern Recognition
  19. 10.1109/TPAMI.1985.4767678 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0004-3702(81)90024-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. ullman, 1979, The Interpretation of Visual Motion, 10.7551/mitpress/3877.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/0734-189X(83)90098-1 · DOI
  23. proffitt, 1984, Converging approaches to extracting structure from motion: Psychophysical and computational investigations of recovering connectivity from moving point-light displays, ?roc First Conf Artif Intell Applications, 232
  24. 10.1109/C-M.1981.220559 · DOI
  25. schunck, 1984, Motion segmentation and estimation by constraint line clustering, Proc IEEE Workshop Computer Vision Representation and Control, 58
  26. 10.1016/0146-664X(79)90097-2 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90018-3 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/S0734-189X(83)80026-7 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.3758/BF03212378 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1364/JOSA.70.000060 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/h0056880 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/0262-8856(85)90003-4 · DOI
  33. buxton, 1985, Scene segmentation as an ill-posed and maximum likelihood problem, Proc Alvey Comput Vision and Image Interpretation Meeting, 10.1016/0262-8856(85)90003-4 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/317314a0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. poggio, 1984, Ill-posed problems and regularization analysis in early vision
  36. besag, 1977, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion), J Roy Statist SOC ?, 36, 192
  37. 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0734-189X(83)80037-1 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0734-189X(83)80030-9 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Murray, D. W., & Buxton, B. F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
1987-03
Volume
PAMI-9
Issue
2
Pages
220-228
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997866406
Cited by
300
References
1
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.