The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optical Flow Estimation: An Error Analysis of Gradient-Based Methods with Local Optimization
Abstract
Multiple views of a scene can provide important information about the structure and dynamic behavior of three-dimensional objects. Many of the methods that recover this information require the determination of optical flow-the velocity, on the image, of visible points on object surfaces. An important class of techniques for estimating optical flow depend on the relationship between the gradients of image brightness. While gradient-based methods have been widely studied, little attention has been paid to accuracy and reliability of the approach. Gradient-based methods are sensitive to conditions commonly encountered in real imagery. Highly textured surfaces, large areas of constant brightness, motion boundaries, and depth discontinuities can all be troublesome for gradient-based methods. Fortunately, these problematic areas are usually localized can be identified in the image. In this paper we examine the sources of errors for gradient-based techniques that locally solve for optical flow. These methods assume that optical flow is constant in a small neighborhood. The consequence of violating in this assumption is examined. The causes of measurement errors and the determinants of the conditioning of the solution system are also considered. By understanding how errors arise, we are able to define the inherent limitations of the technique, obtain estimates of the accuracy of computed values, enhance the performance of the technique, and demonstrate the informative value of some types of error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Cited by
Performance of optical flow techniques
Barron, J. L., Fleet, D. J., & Beauchemin, S. S. (1994) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf01420984 · Cited by 4,305
Lucas/Kanade Meets Horn/Schunck: Combining Local and Global Optic Flow Methods
Bruhn, A., Weickert, J., & Schnörr, C. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000045324.43199.43 · Cited by 1,160
Optical flow using spatiotemporal filters
Heeger, D. J. (1988) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf00133568 · Cited by 534
McCane, B., Novins, K., Crannitch, D., & Galvin, B. (2001) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.2001.0930 · Cited by 250
Optical flow estimation: Advances and comparisons
Otte, M., & Nagel, H. H. (1994) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-57956-7_5 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Kearney, J. K., Thompson, W. B., & Boley, D. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- PAMI-9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-244
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010942916
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Flow Estimation: An Error Analysis of Gradient-Based Methods with Local Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.1987.4767897
- The paper
- Kearney, J. K., Thompson, W. B., & Boley, D. L. (1987). Optical Flow Estimation: An Error Analysis of Gradient-Based Methods with Local Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.1987.4767897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.