The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limits on super-resolution and how to break them
Abstract
Nearly all super-resolution algorithms are based on the fundamental constraints that the super-resolution image should generate low resolution input images when appropriately warped and down-sampled to model the image formation process. (These reconstruction constraints are normally combined with some form of smoothness prior to regularize their solution.) We derive a sequence of analytical results which show that the reconstruction constraints provide less and less useful information as the magnification factor increases. We also validate these results empirically and show that, for large enough magnification factors, any smoothness prior leads to overly smooth results with very little high-frequency content. Next, we propose a super-resolution algorithm that uses a different kind of constraint in addition to the reconstruction constraints. The algorithm attempts to recognize local features in the low-resolution images and then enhances their resolution in an appropriate manner. We call such a super-resolution algorithm a hallucination or reconstruction algorithm. We tried our hallucination algorithm on two different data sets, frontal images of faces and printed Roman text. We obtained significantly better results than existing reconstruction-based algorithms, both qualitatively and in terms of RMS pixel error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
Neural network-based face detection
Rowley, H. A., Baluja, S., & Kanade, T. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.655647 · Cited by 3,554
Cited by
NTIRE 2017 Challenge on Single Image Super-Resolution: Dataset and Study
Agustsson, E., & Timofte, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.150 · Cited by 4,295
Super-resolution from a single image
Glasner, D., Bagon, S., & Irani, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459271 · Cited by 1,889
Sparse Representation for Color Image Restoration
Mairal, J., Elad, M., & Sapiro, G. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2007.911828 · Cited by 1,716
Image super-resolution using gradient profile prior
Sun, J., Xu, Z., & Shum, H.-Y. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587659 · Cited by 916
Image super-resolution: the techniques, applications, and future
Yue, L., Shen, H., Li, J., Yuan, Q., Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2016) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.002 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, S., & Kanade, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1167-1183
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140257560
- Cited by
- 1,205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2002.1033210
- The paper
- Baker, S., & Kanade, T. (2002). Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2002.1033210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.