The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformation-invariant clustering using the EM algorithm
Abstract
Clustering is a simple, effective way to derive useful representations of data, such as images and videos. Clustering explains the input as one of several prototypes, plus noise. In situations where each input has been randomly transformed (e.g., by translation, rotation, and shearing in images and videos), clustering techniques tend to extract cluster centers that account for variations in the input due to transformations, instead of more interesting and potentially useful structure. For example, if images from a video sequence of a person walking across a cluttered background are clustered, it would be more useful for the different clusters to represent different poses and expressions, instead of different positions of the person and different configurations of the background clutter. We describe a way to add transformation invariance to mixture models, by approximating the nonlinear transformation manifold by a discrete set of points. We show how the expectation maximization algorithm can be used to jointly learn clusters, while at the same time inferring the transformation associated with each input. We compare this technique with other methods for filtering noisy images obtained from a scanning electron microscope, clustering images from videos of faces into different categories of identification and pose and removing foreground obstructions from video. We also demonstrate that the new technique is quite insensitive to initial conditions and works better than standard techniques, even when the standard techniques are provided with extra data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models
Tenenbaum, J. B., & Freeman, W. T. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015349 · Cited by 840
Cited by
Separating Style and Content with Bilinear Models
Tenenbaum, J. B., & Freeman, W. T. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015349 · Cited by 840
RASL: Robust Alignment by Sparse and Low-Rank Decomposition for Linearly Correlated Images
Peng, Y., Ganesh, A., Wright, J., Xu, W., & Ma, Y. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.282 · Cited by 817
Features for image retrieval: an experimental comparison
Deselaers, T., Keysers, D., & Ney, H. (2008) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-007-9039-3 · Cited by 585
A Parallel Random Forest Algorithm for Big Data in a Spark Cloud Computing Environment
Chen, J., Li, K., Tang, Z., Bilal, K., Yu, S., Weng, C., & Li, K. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2016.2603511 · Cited by 435
Neural Congealing: Aligning Images to a Joint Semantic Atlas
Ofri-Amar, D., Geyer, M., Kasten, Y., & Dekel, T. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01859 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Frey, B. J., & Jojic, N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123782934
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transformation-invariant clustering using the EM algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2003.1159942
- The paper
- Frey, B. J., & Jojic, N. (2003). Transformation-invariant clustering using the EM algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2003.1159942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.