The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust online appearance models for visual tracking
Abstract
We propose a framework for learning robust, adaptive, appearance models to be used for motion-based tracking of natural objects. The model adapts to slowly changing appearance, and it maintains a natural measure of the stability of the observed image structure during tracking. By identifying stable properties of appearance, we can weight them more heavily for motion estimation, while less stable properties can be proportionately downweighted. The appearance model involves a mixture of stable image structure, learned over long time courses, along with two-frame motion information and an outlier process. An online EM-algorithm is used to adapt the appearance model parameters over time. An implementation of this approach is developed for an appearance model based on the filter responses from a steerable pyramid. This model is used in a motion-based tracking algorithm to provide robustness in the face of image outliers, such as those caused by occlusions, while adapting to natural changes in appearance such as those due to facial expressions or variations in 3D pose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination
Hager, G. D., & Belhumeur, P. N. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.722606 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
Online Object Tracking: A Benchmark
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.312 · Cited by 4,138
Wu, Y., Lim, J., & Yang, M.-H. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2388226 · Cited by 3,371
Visual object tracking using adaptive correlation filters
Bolme, D., Beveridge, J. R., Draper, B. A., & Lui, Y. M. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539960 · Cited by 3,406
Incremental Learning for Robust Visual Tracking
Ross, D. A., Lim, J., Lin, R.-S., & Yang, M.-H. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0075-7 · Cited by 3,061
Learning Multi-domain Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Tracking
Nam, H., & Han, B. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.465 · Cited by 2,806
Metadata
- Authors
- Jepson, A. D., Fleet, D. J., & El-Maraghi, T. F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1296-1311
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613779721
- Cited by
- 922
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 41.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
