Cited by 1,133Gait Recognition and AnalysisVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis

Sarkar, S., Phillips, P.J., Liu, Z., Vega, I.R., Grother, P., Bowyer, K.W.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Identification of people by analysis of gait patterns extracted from video has recently become a popular research problem. However, the conditions under which the problem is "solvable" are not understood or characterized. To provide a means for measuring progress and characterizing the properties of gait recognition, we introduce the HumanID Gait Challenge Problem. The challenge problem consists of a baseline algorithm, a set of 12 experiments, and a large data set. The baseline algorithm estimates silhouettes by background subtraction and performs recognition by temporal correlation of silhouettes. The 12 experiments are of increasing difficulty, as measured by the baseline algorithm, and examine the effects of five covariates on performance. The covariates are: change in viewing angle, change in shoe type, change in walking surface, carrying or not carrying a briefcase, and elapsed time between sequences being compared. Identification rates for the 12 experiments range from 78 percent on the easiest experiment to 3 percent on the hardest. All five covariates had statistically significant effects on performance, with walking surface and time difference having the greatest impact. The data set consists of 1,870 sequences from 122 subjects spanning five covariates (1.2 Gigabytes of data). The gait data, the source code of the baseline algorithm, and scripts to run, score, and analyze the challenge experiments are available at http://www.GaitChallenge.org. This infrastructure s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2005.39

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The USF dataset comprises 1,870 sequences from 122 subjects using two different shoe types.

    “The University of South Florida (USF) dataset [84] comprises 1 , 870 sequences from 122 subjects using two different shoe types.”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [84]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarkar, S., Phillips, P. J., Liu, Z., Vega, I. R., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K. W.
Affiliations
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2005-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
162-177
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
OpenAlex
W2151458682
Cited by
1,133
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 65
FWCI
43.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Notre Dame
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
gait recognition, background subtraction, temporal correlation, walking surfaces, viewing angle, shoe type, benchmark dataset
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Biometry, Female, Gait, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review