The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis
Abstract
Identification of people by analysis of gait patterns extracted from video has recently become a popular research problem. However, the conditions under which the problem is "solvable" are not understood or characterized. To provide a means for measuring progress and characterizing the properties of gait recognition, we introduce the HumanID Gait Challenge Problem. The challenge problem consists of a baseline algorithm, a set of 12 experiments, and a large data set. The baseline algorithm estimates silhouettes by background subtraction and performs recognition by temporal correlation of silhouettes. The 12 experiments are of increasing difficulty, as measured by the baseline algorithm, and examine the effects of five covariates on performance. The covariates are: change in viewing angle, change in shoe type, change in walking surface, carrying or not carrying a briefcase, and elapsed time between sequences being compared. Identification rates for the 12 experiments range from 78 percent on the easiest experiment to 3 percent on the hardest. All five covariates had statistically significant effects on performance, with walking surface and time difference having the greatest impact. The data set consists of 1,870 sequences from 122 subjects spanning five covariates (1.2 Gigabytes of data). The gait data, the source code of the baseline algorithm, and scripts to run, score, and analyze the challenge experiments are available at http://www.GaitChallenge.org. This infrastructure s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The USF dataset comprises 1,870 sequences from 122 subjects using two different shoe types.
“The University of South Florida (USF) dataset [84] comprises 1 , 870 sequences from 122 subjects using two different shoe types.”
From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [84]
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hofmann, M., Geiger, J., Bachmann, S., Schuller, B., & Rigoll, G. (2014) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2013.02.006 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Learning Race from Face: A Survey
Fu, S., He, H., & Hou, Z.-G. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2014.2321570 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Robust gait recognition: a comprehensive survey
Rida, I., Almaadeed, N., & Almaadeed, S. (2019) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5063 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Wang, X., & Yan, W. Q. (2020) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065719500278 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
Filipi Gonçalves dos Santos, C., Oliveira, D. D. S., A. Passos, L., Gonçalves Pires, R., Felipe Silva Santos, D., Pascotti Valem, L., P. Moreira, T., Cleison S. Santana, M., Roder, M., Paulo Papa, J., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3490235 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Robust Cross-View Gait Recognition with Evidence: A Discriminant Gait GAN (DiGGAN) Approach
Hu, B., Guan, Y., Gao, Y., Long, Y., Lane, N., & Ploetz, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.10493 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sarkar, S., Phillips, P. J., Liu, Z., Vega, I. R., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K. W.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-177
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2151458682
- Cited by
- 1,133
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 43.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Notre Dame
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- gait recognition, background subtraction, temporal correlation, walking surfaces, viewing angle, shoe type, benchmark dataset
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Biometry, Female, Gait, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photography, Sensitivity and Specificity, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review