Cited by 230Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and ELMMachine Learning and Data Classification

Fast SVM training algorithm with decomposition on very large data sets

Jian-xiong Dong, Krzyzak, A., Suen, C.Y.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Training a support vector machine on a data set of huge size with thousands of classes is a challenging problem. This paper proposes an efficient algorithm to solve this problem. The key idea is to introduce a parallel optimization step to quickly remove most of the nonsupport vectors, where block diagonal matrices are used to approximate the original kernel matrix so that the original problem can be split into hundreds of subproblems which can be solved more efficiently. In addition, some effective strategies such as kernel caching and efficient computation of kernel matrix are integrated to speed up the training process. Our analysis of the proposed algorithm shows that its time complexity grows linearly with the number of classes and size of the data set. In the experiments, many appealing properties of the proposed algorithm have been investigated and the results show that the proposed algorithm has a much better scaling capability than Libsvm, SVMlight, and SVMTorch. Moreover, the good generalization performances on several large databases have also been achieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2005.77

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Training SVM on large datasets is inefficient or slow and a bottleneck because of high computational complexity (QP time O(n^3) and space O(n^2)) and model complexity.

    “However, it is inefficient or impracticable to implement support vector machine in dealing with large scale training set due to its computational difficulties as well as the model complexity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, J.-X., Krzyzak, A., & Suen, C. Y.
Affiliations
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2005-04
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
603-618
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095885101
Cited by
230
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 8
FWCI
19.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
support vector machine training, decomposition method, large-scale datasets, parallel optimization, linear time complexity, scalability
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Data Processing, Computer Simulation, Database Management Systems, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review