Fast SVM training algorithm with decomposition on very large data sets
Abstract
Training a support vector machine on a data set of huge size with thousands of classes is a challenging problem. This paper proposes an efficient algorithm to solve this problem. The key idea is to introduce a parallel optimization step to quickly remove most of the nonsupport vectors, where block diagonal matrices are used to approximate the original kernel matrix so that the original problem can be split into hundreds of subproblems which can be solved more efficiently. In addition, some effective strategies such as kernel caching and efficient computation of kernel matrix are integrated to speed up the training process. Our analysis of the proposed algorithm shows that its time complexity grows linearly with the number of classes and size of the data set. In the experiments, many appealing properties of the proposed algorithm have been investigated and the results show that the proposed algorithm has a much better scaling capability than Libsvm, SVMlight, and SVMTorch. Moreover, the good generalization performances on several large databases have also been achieved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Training SVM on large datasets is inefficient or slow and a bottleneck because of high computational complexity (QP time O(n^3) and space O(n^2)) and model complexity.
“However, it is inefficient or impracticable to implement support vector machine in dealing with large scale training set due to its computational difficulties as well as the model complexity.”
From An efficient instance selection algorithm to reconstruct training set for support vector machine (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
Cites
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287 · see citing works
Automated empirical optimizations of software and the ATLAS project
Clint Whaley, R., Petitet, A., & Dongarra, J. J. (2001) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8191(00)00087-9 · Cited by 1,317 · see citing works
Efficient Greedy Learning of Gaussian Mixture Models
Verbeek, J. J., Vlassis, N., & Kröse, B. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603762553004 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An efficient instance selection algorithm to reconstruct training set for support vector machine
Liu, C., Wang, W., Wang, M., Lv, F., & Konan, M. (2017) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.10.031 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dong, J.-X., Krzyzak, A., & Suen, C. Y.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (US)
- ORCID
- Suen, C.Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-618
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2095885101
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- support vector machine training, decomposition method, large-scale datasets, parallel optimization, linear time complexity, scalability
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Data Processing, Computer Simulation, Database Management Systems, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review