The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting
Abstract
Previous work has demonstrated that the image variation of many objects (human faces in particular) under variable lighting can be effectively modeled by low-dimensional linear spaces, even when there are multiple light sources and shadowing. Basis images spanning this space are usually obtained in one of three ways: A large set of images of the object under different lighting conditions is acquired, and principal component analysis (PCA) is used to estimate a subspace. Alternatively, synthetic images are rendered from a 3D model (perhaps reconstructed from images) under point sources and, again, PCA is used to estimate a subspace. Finally, images rendered from a 3D model under diffuse lighting based on spherical harmonics are directly used as basis images. In this paper, we show how to arrange physical lighting so that the acquired images of each object can be directly used as the basis vectors of a low-dimensional linear space and that this subspace is close to those acquired by the other methods. More specifically, there exist configurations of k point light source directions, with k typically ranging from 5 to 9, such that, by taking k images of an object under these single sources, the resulting subspace is an effective representation for recognition under a wide range of lighting conditions. Since the subspace is generated directly from real images, potentially complex and/or brittle intermediate steps such as 3D reconstruction can be completely avoided; nor is it necessary to acquire large numbers of training images or to physically construct complex diffuse (harmonic) light fields. We validate the use of subspaces constructed in this fashion within the context of face recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Cited by
Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation
Wright, J., Yang, A. Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.79 · Cited by 9,388
Sparse Subspace Clustering: Algorithm, Theory, and Applications
Elhamifar, E., & Vidal, R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.57 · Cited by 3,106
Online Learning for Matrix Factorization and Sparse Coding
Mairal, J., Bach, F., Ponce, J., & Sapiro, G. (2009) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0908.0050 · Cited by 2,258
Discriminative K-SVD for dictionary learning in face recognition
Zhang, Q., & Li, B. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539989 · Cited by 1,237
Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control
Brunton, S. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108380690 · Cited by 1,154
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K.-C., Ho, J., & Kriegman, D. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 684-698
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125874614
- Cited by
- 2,391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.