The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A system for learning statistical motion patterns
Abstract
Analysis of motion patterns is an effective approach for anomaly detection and behavior prediction. Current approaches for the analysis of motion patterns depend on known scenes, where objects move in predefined ways. It is highly desirable to automatically construct object motion patterns which reflect the knowledge of the scene. In this paper, we present a system for automatically learning motion patterns for anomaly detection and behavior prediction based on a proposed algorithm for robustly tracking multiple objects. In the tracking algorithm, foreground pixels are clustered using a fast accurate fuzzy K-means algorithm. Growing and prediction of the cluster centroids of foreground pixels ensure that each cluster centroid is associated with a moving object in the scene. In the algorithm for learning motion patterns, trajectories are clustered hierarchically using spatial and temporal information and then each motion pattern is represented with a chain of Gaussian distributions. Based on the learned statistical motion patterns, statistical methods are used to detect anomalies and predict behaviors. Our system is tested using image sequences acquired, respectively, from a crowded real traffic scene and a model traffic scene. Experimental results show the robustness of the tracking algorithm, the efficiency of the algorithm for learning motion patterns, and the encouraging performance of algorithms for anomaly detection and behavior prediction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Activity Recognition and Abnormality Detection with the Switching Hidden Semi-Markov Model
Duong, T. V., Bui, H. H., Phung, D. Q., & Venkatesh, S. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.61 · Cited by 535 · cited 1×
“Duong et al. [11] apply the Switching Hidden Semi-Markov Model to learn and recognize human behaviors and detect anomalies.”
BackgroundJonasson, Z. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.10.006 · Cited by 498
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1109/3477.809033 · DOI
- Bennewitz, Utilizing Learned Motion Patterns to Robustly Track Persons, 102
- 10.1109/ICCV.1993.378214 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/34.643892 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/AFGR.1996.557249 · doi:10.1109/afgr.1996.557249
- 10.1109/34.868685 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/91.995126 · doi:10.1109/91.995126
- 10.1109/AFGR.1998.670984 · doi:10.1109/afgr.1998.670984
- 10.1007/3-540-63931-4_226 · doi:10.1007/3-540-63931-4_226
- Ellis, Learning a Multi-Camera Topology, 165
- 10.1109/TFUZZ.2003.809902 · DOI
- 10.1006/cviu.2000.0894 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/34.868683 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/cvpr.1997.609329 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.829274 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/34.868686 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0262-8856(96)01101-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Joseph, Double Exponential Smoothing: An Alternative to Kalman Filter-Based Predictive Tracking, 199
- 10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334359 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2004.1334359
- 10.1109/6979.880968 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/3-540-57956-7_22 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSMCB.2005.846652 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0262-8856(02)00098-7 · DOI
- 10.1109/ITSC.2002.1041182 · doi:10.1109/itsc.2002.1041182
- 10.1006/cviu.2000.0870 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0218001400000374 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211525 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1021849801764 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211524 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCB.2004.826829 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.868684 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/VS.2000.856860 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCB.2002.1033179 · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2002.1033179
- 10.1109/CVPR.2004.434 · DOI
- Pece, From Cluster Tracking to People Counting, 9
- 10.1109/34.771328 · doi:10.1109/34.771328
- 10.1109/34.735811 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/34.868677 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0262-8856(99)00073-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2004.413 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.413
- 10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211526 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.868687 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.1997.609442 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.85677 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710709 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1023803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2003.1211503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315249 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/icpr.2004.1333885 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2004.1333885
Cited by
Trajectory-Based Anomalous Event Detection
Piciarelli, C., Micheloni, C., & Foresti, G. L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2008.2005599 · Cited by 532
Online detection of unusual events in videos via dynamic sparse coding
Zhao, B., Fei-Fei, L., & Xing, E. P. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995524 · Cited by 532
Detecting anomalous events in videos by learning deep representations of appearance and motion
Xu, D., Yan, Y., Ricci, E., & Sebe, N. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2016.10.010 · Cited by 474
Deep-anomaly: Fully convolutional neural network for fast anomaly detection in crowded scenes
Sabokrou, M., Fayyaz, M., Fathy, M., Moayed, Z., & Klette, R. (2018) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2018.02.006 · Cited by 470
CommonRoad: Composable benchmarks for motion planning on roads
Althoff, M., Koschi, M., & Manzinger, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995802 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, W., Xiao, X., Fu, Z., Xie, D., Tan, T., & Maybank, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1450-1464
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2122075562
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.