The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robust point matching for nonrigid shapes by preserving local neighborhood structures
Abstract
In previous work on point matching, a set of points is often treated as an instance of a joint distribution to exploit global relationships in the point set. For nonrigid shapes, however, the local relationship among neighboring points is stronger and more stable than the global one. In this paper, we introduce the lotion of a neighborhood structure for the general point matching problem. We formulate point matching as an optimization problem to preserve local neighborhood structures during matching. Our approach has a simple graph matching interpretation, where each point is a node in the graph, and two nodes are connected by an edge if they are neighbors. The optimal match between two graphs is the one that maximizes the number of matched edges. Existing techniques are leveraged to search for an optimal solution with the shape context distance used to initialize the graph matching, followed by relaxation labeling updates for refinement. Extensive experiments show the robustness of our approach under deformation, noise in point locations, outliers, occlusion, and rotation. It outperforms the shape context and TPS-RPM algorithms on most scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts
Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.993558 · Cited by 6,306
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration
Chui, H., & Rangarajan, A. (2003) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/s1077-3142(03)00009-2 · Cited by 1,560
A graduated assignment algorithm for graph matching
Gold, S., & Rangarajan, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.491619 · Cited by 1,090
Cited by
Ma, J., Zhao, J., Jiang, J., Zhou, H., & Guo, X. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-018-1117-z · Cited by 601
Non-Rigid Point Set Registration by Preserving Global and Local Structures
Ma, J., Zhao, J., & Yuille, A. L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2015.2467217 · Cited by 334
Guided Locality Preserving Feature Matching for Remote Sensing Image Registration
Ma, J., Jiang, J., Zhou, H., Zhao, J., & Guo, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2018.2820040 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, Y., & Doermann, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 643-649
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116801532
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.