The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discriminative Learning and Recognition of Image Set Classes Using Canonical Correlations
Abstract
We address the problem of comparing sets of images for object recognition, where the sets may represent variations in an object's appearance due to changing camera pose and lighting conditions. Canonical Correlations (also known as principal or canonical angles), which can be thought of as the angles between two d-dimensional subspaces, have recently attracted attention for image set matching. Canonical correlations offer many benefits in accuracy, efficiency, and robustness compared to the two main classical methods: parametric distribution-based and nonparametric sample-based matching of sets. Here, this is first demonstrated experimentally for reasonably sized data sets using existing methods exploiting canonical correlations. Motivated by their proven effectiveness, a novel discriminative learning method over sets is proposed for set classification. Specifically, inspired by classical Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), we develop a linear discriminant function that maximizes the canonical correlations of within-class sets and minimizes the canonical correlations of between-class sets. Image sets transformed by the discriminant function are then compared by the canonical correlations. Classical orthogonal subspace method (OSM) is also investigated for the similar purpose and compared with the proposed method. The proposed method is evaluated on various object recognition problems using face image sets with arbitrary motion captured under different illuminations and image sets of 500 general objects taken at different views. The method is also applied to object category recognition using ETH-80 database. The proposed method is shown to outperform the state-of-the-art methods in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical Computations on Grassmann and Stiefel Manifolds for Image and Video-Based Recognition
Turaga, P., Veeraraghavan, A., Srivastava, A., & Chellappa, R. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.52 · Cited by 371
Manifold Discriminant Analysis
Wang, R., & Chen, X. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206850 · Cited by 285
Partial least squares regression on grassmannian manifold for emotion recognition
Liu, M., Wang, R., Huang, Z., Shan, S., & Chen, X. (2013) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction · doi:10.1145/2522848.2531738 · Cited by 62
Hayat, M., Bennamoun, M., & El-Sallam, A. A. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2013.6475003 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, T.-K., Kittler, J., & Cipolla, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1005-1018
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2150600350
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminative Learning and Recognition of Image Set Classes Using Canonical Correlations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.1037
- The paper
- Kim, T.-K., Kittler, J., & Cipolla, R. (2007). Discriminative Learning and Recognition of Image Set Classes Using Canonical Correlations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.1037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.