The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Video Behavior Profiling for Anomaly Detection
Abstract
This paper aims to address the problem of modelling video behaviour captured in surveillancevideos for the applications of online normal behaviour recognition and anomaly detection. A novelframework is developed for automatic behaviour profiling and online anomaly sampling/detectionwithout any manual labelling of the training dataset. The framework consists of the followingkey components: (1) A compact and effective behaviour representation method is developed basedon discrete scene event detection. The similarity between behaviour patterns are measured basedon modelling each pattern using a Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN). (2) Natural grouping ofbehaviour patterns is discovered through a novel spectral clustering algorithm with unsupervisedmodel selection and feature selection on the eigenvectors of a normalised affinity matrix. (3) Acomposite generative behaviour model is constructed which is capable of generalising from asmall training set to accommodate variations in unseen normal behaviour patterns. (4) A run-timeaccumulative anomaly measure is introduced to detect abnormal behaviour while normal behaviourpatterns are recognised when sufficient visual evidence has become available based on an onlineLikelihood Ratio Test (LRT) method. This ensures robust and reliable anomaly detection and normalbehaviour recognition at the shortest possible time. The effectiveness and robustness of our approachis demonstrated through experiments using noisy and sparse datasets collected from both indoorand outdoor surveillance scenarios. In particular, it is shown that a behaviour model trained usingan unlabelled dataset is superior to those trained using the same but labelled dataset in detectinganomaly from an unseen video. The experiments also suggest that our online LRT based behaviourrecognition approach is advantageous over the commonly used Maximum Likelihood (ML) methodin differentiating ambiguities among different behaviour classes observed online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Activity Recognition and Abnormality Detection with the Switching Hidden Semi-Markov Model
Duong, T. V., Bui, H. H., Phung, D. Q., & Venkatesh, S. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.61 · Cited by 535 · cited 1×
“Much work on abnormal behavior detection 1 took a supervised learning approach [16], [14], [8], [5], [3] based on the assumption that there exist well-defined and known a priori behavior classes (both normal and abnormal).”
Background
Cited by
Anomaly Detection and Localization in Crowded Scenes
Li, W., Mahadevan, V., & Vasconcelos, N. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.111 · Cited by 1,017
Morris, B. T., & Trivedi, M. M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.64 · Cited by 349
Hierarchical and Networked Vehicle Surveillance in ITS: A Survey
Tian, B., Morris, B. T., Tang, M., Liu, Y., Yao, Y., Gou, C., Shen, D., & Tang, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2016.2552778 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiang, T., & Gong, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 893-908
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2112680570
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 45.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Video Behavior Profiling for Anomaly Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.70731
- The paper
- Xiang, T., & Gong, S. (2008). Video Behavior Profiling for Anomaly Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.70731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.