The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised Activity Perception in Crowded and Complicated Scenes Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models
Open accessAbstract
We propose a novel unsupervised learning framework to model activities and interactions in crowded and complicated scenes. Hierarchical Bayesian models are used to connect three elements in visual surveillance: low-level visual features, simple "atomic" activities, and interactions. Atomic activities are modeled as distributions over low-level visual features, and multi-agent interactions are modeled as distributions over atomic activities. These models are learnt in an unsupervised way. Given a long video sequence, moving pixels are clustered into different atomic activities and short video clips are clustered into different interactions. In this paper, we propose three hierarchical Bayesian models, Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) mixture model, Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP) mixture model, and Dual Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes (Dual-HDP) model. They advance existing language models, such as LDA [1] and HDP [2]. Our data sets are challenging video sequences from crowded traffic scenes and train station scenes with many kinds of activities co-occurring. Without tracking and human labeling effort, our framework completes many challenging visual surveillance tasks of board interest such as: (1) discovering typical atomic activities and interactions; (2) segmenting long video sequences into different interactions; (3) segmenting motions into different activities; (4) detecting abnormality; and (5) supporting high-level queries on activities and interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Cited by
Sparse reconstruction cost for abnormal event detection
Cong, Y., Yuan, J., & Liu, J. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995434 · Cited by 801
STGAT: Modeling Spatial-Temporal Interactions for Human Trajectory Prediction
Huang, Y., Bi, H., Li, Z., Mao, T., & Wang, Z. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00637 · Cited by 658
Unstructured human activity detection from RGBD images
Sung, J., Ponce, C., Selman, B., & Saxena, A. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/icra.2012.6224591 · Cited by 511
Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., & Jung, S. K. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.04.024 · Cited by 396
Morris, B. T., & Trivedi, M. M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.64 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., Ma, X., & Grimson, W. E. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-555
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149021215
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 49.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised Activity Perception in Crowded and Complicated Scenes Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2008.87
- The paper
- Wang, X., Ma, X., & Grimson, W. E. L. (2009). Unsupervised Activity Perception in Crowded and Complicated Scenes Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2008.87
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.