The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Event Recognition in Videos by Learning from Web Data
Abstract
We propose a visual event recognition framework for consumer videos by leveraging a large amount of loosely labeled web videos (e.g., from YouTube). Observing that consumer videos generally contain large intraclass variations within the same type of events, we first propose a new method, called Aligned Space-Time Pyramid Matching (ASTPM), to measure the distance between any two video clips. Second, we propose a new transfer learning method, referred to as Adaptive Multiple Kernel Learning (A-MKL), in order to 1) fuse the information from multiple pyramid levels and features (i.e., space-time features and static SIFT features) and 2) cope with the considerable variation in feature distributions between videos from two domains (i.e., web video domain and consumer video domain). For each pyramid level and each type of local features, we first train a set of SVM classifiers based on the combined training set from two domains by using multiple base kernels from different kernel types and parameters, which are then fused with equal weights to obtain a prelearned average classifier. In A-MKL, for each event class we learn an adapted target classifier based on multiple base kernels and the prelearned average classifiers from this event class or all the event classes by minimizing both the structural risk functional and the mismatch between data distributions of two domains. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework that requires only a small number of labeled consumer videos by leveraging web data. We also conduct an in-depth investigation on various aspects of the proposed method A-MKL, such as the analysis on the combination coefficients on the prelearned classifiers, the convergence of the learning algorithm, and the performance variation by using different proportions of labeled consumer videos. Moreover, we show that A-MKL using the prelearned classifiers from all the event classes leads to better performance when compared with A-MK- using the prelearned classifiers only from each individual event class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
Adapting visual category models to new domains
Saenko, K., Kulis, B., Fritz, M., & Darrell, T. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15561-1_16 · Cited by 2,847
Integrating structured biological data by Kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy
Borgwardt, K. M., Gretton, A., Rasch, M. J., Kriegel, H.-P., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl242 · Cited by 1,674
Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning
Blitzer, J., McDonald, R., & Pereira, F. (2006) · Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP '06 · doi:10.3115/1610075.1610094 · Cited by 1,543
Cited by
Geodesic flow kernel for unsupervised domain adaptation
Gong, B., Shi, Y., Sha, F., & Grauman, K. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247911 · Cited by 2,093
Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wild
Chen, Y., Li, W., Sakaridis, C., Dai, D., & Van Gool, L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00352 · Cited by 1,672
Transfer Learning for Visual Categorization: A Survey
Shao, L., Zhu, F., & Li, X. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2014.2330900 · Cited by 895
What you saw is not what you get: Domain adaptation using asymmetric kernel transforms
Kulis, B., Saenko, K., & Darrell, T. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995702 · Cited by 688
A Review of Domain Adaptation without Target Labels
Kouw, W. M., & Loog, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2945942 · Cited by 613
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, L., Xu, D., Tsang, I. W.-H., & Luo, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1667-1680
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2099501835
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 46.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.