Cited by 1,573Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Toward Open Set Recognition

Scheirer, W. J., de Rezende Rocha, A., Sapkota, A., Boult, T. E.·2013·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

To date, almost all experimental evaluations of machine learning-based recognition algorithms in computer vision have taken the form of "closed set" recognition, whereby all testing classes are known at training time. A more realistic scenario for vision applications is "open set" recognition, where incomplete knowledge of the world is present at training time, and unknown classes can be submitted to an algorithm during testing. This paper explores the nature of open set recognition and formalizes its definition as a constrained minimization problem. The open set recognition problem is not well addressed by existing algorithms because it requires strong generalization. As a step toward a solution, we introduce a novel "1-vs-set machine," which sculpts a decision space from the marginal distances of a 1-class or binary SVM with a linear kernel. This methodology applies to several different applications in computer vision where open set recognition is a challenging problem, including object recognition and face verification. We consider both in this work, with large scale cross-dataset experiments performed over the Caltech 256 and ImageNet sets, as well as face matching experiments performed over the Labeled Faces in the Wild set. The experiments highlight the effectiveness of machines adapted for open set evaluation compared to existing 1-class and binary SVMs for the same tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2012.256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If a robot's vision system is fooled by data outside of its training data distribution, the consequences of acting on false but high-confidence detections can be disastrous.

    “For instance, if a robot's vision system (object detection) is fooled by data outside of its training data distribution [244], the consequences of acting on false but high-confidence detections can be disastrous.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 1,573

Authors
Scheirer, W. J., de Rezende Rocha, A., Sapkota, A., & Boult, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2013-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1757-1772
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
OpenAlex
W2119880843
Cited by
1,573
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 220 · 2022: 172 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
open-set recognition, closed-set recognition, object recognition, face verification, face matching, cross-dataset generalization, unknown classes
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Biometric Identification, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review