The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Collaborative Filtering by Trust
Open accessAbstract
Recommender systems are used to accurately and actively provide users with potentially interesting information or services. Collaborative filtering is a widely adopted approach to recommendation, but sparse data and cold-start users are often barriers to providing high quality recommendations. To address such issues, we propose a novel method that works to improve the performance of collaborative filtering recommendations by integrating sparse rating data given by users and sparse social trust network among these same users. This is a model-based method that adopts matrix factorization technique that maps users into low-dimensional latent feature spaces in terms of their trust relationship, and aims to more accurately reflect the users reciprocal influence on the formation of their own opinions and to learn better preferential patterns of users for high-quality recommendations. We use four large-scale datasets to show that the proposed method performs much better, especially for cold start users, than state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms for social collaborative filtering based on trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Probabilistic Model for Using Social Networks in Personalized Item Recommendation
Chaney, A. J. B., Blei, D. M., & Eliassi-Rad, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/2792838.2800193 · Cited by 164
Cited by
Machine learning algorithms for social media analysis: A survey
T.K., B., Annavarapu, C. S. R., & Bablani, A. (2021) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100395 · Cited by 276
A Probabilistic Model for Using Social Networks in Personalized Item Recommendation
Chaney, A. J. B., Blei, D. M., & Eliassi-Rad, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems · doi:10.1145/2792838.2800193 · Cited by 164
Himeur, Y., Sohail, S. S., Bensaali, F., Amira, A., & Alazab, M. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102746 · Cited by 139
Learning Personalized Preference of Strong and Weak Ties for Social Recommendation
Wang, X., Hoi, S. C. H., Ester, M., Bu, J., & Chen, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052556 · Cited by 97
Modeling dual role preferences for trust-aware recommendation
Yao, W., He, J., Huang, G., & Zhang, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/2600428.2609488 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, B., Lei, Y., Liu, J., & Li, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2017-08-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1633-1647
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W2217347858
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 161.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Collaborative Filtering by Trust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2016.2605085
- The paper
- Yang, B., Lei, Y., Liu, J., & Li, W. (2017). Social Collaborative Filtering by Trust. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2016.2605085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.