Cited by 356Neural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Information dropout: learning optimal representations through noisy computation

Open access
Achille, Alessandro, Soatto, Stefano·2018·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

The cross-entropy loss commonly used in deep learning is closely related to the defining properties of optimal representations, but does not enforce some of the key properties. We show that this can be solved by adding a regularization term, which is in turn related to injecting multiplicative noise in the activations of a Deep Neural Network, a special case of which is the common practice of dropout. We show that our regularized loss function can be efficiently minimized using Information Dropout, a generalization of dropout rooted in information theoretic principles that automatically adapts to the data and can better exploit architectures of limited capacity. When the task is the reconstruction of the input, we show that our loss function yields a Variational Autoencoder as a special case, thus providing a link between representation learning, information theory and variational inference. Finally, we prove that we can promote the creation of optimal disentangled representations simply by enforcing a factorized prior, a fact that has been observed empirically in recent work. Our experiments validate the theoretical intuitions behind our method, and we find that Information Dropout achieves a comparable or better generalization performance than binary dropout, especially on smaller models, since it can automatically adapt the noise to the structure of the network, as well as to the test sample.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2017.2784440

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dropout occurs during training of a network, when inputs are made sparse by randomly dropping out some of them, a form of regularization during learning mathematically similar to noise injection.

    “Dropout occurs during the training of a network, when inputs are made sparse by randomly “dropping out” some of them, a form of regularization during learning which is mathematically similar to a noise injection.126”

    From The overfitted brain: Dreams evolved to assist generalization (2021) · cites this paper as [143]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 356

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. N. Tishby, F. C. Pereira, and W. Bialek, "The information bottle- neck method," in Proc. 37-th Annu. Allerton Conf. Commun., Control Comput., 1999.
  2. A. A. Alemi, I. Fischer, J. V. Dillon, and K. Murphy, "Deep varia- tional information bottleneck," in Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Repre- sentations, 2017.
  3. D. P. Kingma, T. Salimans, R. Jozefowicz, X. Chen, I. Sutskever, and M. Welling, "Improved variational inference with inverse autoregres- sive flow," in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2016, pp. 4743-4751.
  4. Stefano Soatto received the DIng degree (high- est honors) from the University of Padova -Italy, in 1992, and the PhD degree in control and dynam- ical systems from the California Institute of Tech- nology, in 1996. He joined UCLA, in 2000 after being an assistant and then an associate profes- sor of electrical and biomedical engineering with Washington University, and a research associate in applied sciences with Harvard University. From 1995 to 1998, he was also ricercatore in the Department of Mathematics and Computer Sci- ence, University of Udine -Italy. His general research interests include computer vision and nonlinear estimation and control theory. In particular, he is interested in ways for computers to use sensory information (e.g. vision, sound, touch) to interact with humans and the environment. " For more information on this or any other computing topic, please visit our Digital Library at www.computer.org/publications/dlib.

Authors
Achille, A., & Soatto, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
2897-2905
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2683470288
Cited by
356
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 1
FWCI
25.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
optimal representation, variational autoencoder, disentangled representations, representation learning, variational inference, information theory, generalization, model capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review