Joint feature synthesis and embedding: Adversarial cross-modal retrieval revisited
Open accessAbstract
Recently, generative adversarial network (GAN) has shown its strong ability on modeling data distribution via adversarial learning. Cross-modal GAN, which attempts to utilize the power of GAN to model the cross-modal joint distribution and to learn compatible cross-modal features, is becoming the research hotspot. However, the existing cross-modal GAN approaches typically 1) require labeled multimodal data of massive labor cost to establish cross-modal correlation; 2) utilize the vanilla GAN model that results in unstable training procedure and meaningless synthetic features; and 3) lack of extensibility for retrieving cross-modal data of new classes. In this article, we revisit the adversarial learning in existing cross-modal GAN methods and propose Joint Feature Synthesis and Embedding (JFSE), a novel method that jointly performs multimodal feature synthesis and common embedding space learning to overcome the above three shortcomings. Specifically, JFSE deploys two coupled conditional Wassertein GAN modules for the input data of two modalities, to synthesize meaningful and correlated multimodal features under the guidance of the word embeddings of class labels. Moreover, three advanced distribution alignment schemes with advanced cycle-consistency constraints are proposed to preserve the semantic compatibility and enable the knowledge transfer in the common embedding space for both the true and synthetic cross-modal features. All these add-ons in JFSE not only help to learn more effective common embedding space that effectively captures the cross-modal correlation but also facilitate to transfer knowledge to multimodal data of new classes. Extensive experiments are conducted on four widely used cross-modal datasets, and the comparisons with more than ten state-of-the-art approaches show that our JFSE method achieves remarkably accuracy improvement on both standard retrieval and the newly explored zero-shot and generalized zero-shot retrieval tasks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contrastive and self-supervised learning optimize alignment between modalities, enhancing cross-modal information flow and interaction.
“By utilizing methods such as contrastive learning and self-supervised learning, the model can optimize the alignment between modalities, thereby enhancing the flow and interaction of information across them [175].”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [175]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Xu, X., Lin, K., Yang, Y., Hanjalic, A., & Shen, H. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3030-3047
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W3111984153
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 4.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- resolver.tudelft.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61976049, 61632007)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZYGX2019Z015)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- cross-modal retrieval, conditional generative adversarial networks, distribution alignment, zero-shot retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Learning, Semantics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review