The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stability Simulation Of Wind Turbine Systems
Abstract
A simulation and digital computer modeling effort is described in which a wind turbine- generator system is adapted for stability evaluation using a large scale transient stability computer program. Component models of the MOD-2 wind generator system are described and their digital model equations are provided. A versatile wind velocity model is described, which provides the capability of simulating a wide variety of wind variations, in addition to the usual network disturbances. Computed results obtained from runs of the enhanced stability program are provided that illustrate the wind turbine-generator system dynamic performance for changes in wind velocity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Overview on Fault Diagnosis, Prognosis and Resilient Control for Wind Turbine Systems
Gao, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9020300 · Cited by 281
Giaourakis, D. G., & Safacas, A. N. (2016) · Wind Energy · doi:10.1002/we.1849 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P., & Bose, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- PAS-102
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3791-3795
- ISSN
- 0018-9510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002684817
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability Simulation Of Wind Turbine Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpas.1983.317873
- The paper
- Anderson, P., & Bose, A. (1983). Stability Simulation Of Wind Turbine Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpas.1983.317873
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
