Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 942

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal Power Flow By Newton Approach

Sun, David, Ashley, Bruce, Brewer, Brian, Hughes, Art, Tinney, William·1984·IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems

Abstract

The classical optimal power flow problem with a nonseparable objective function can be solved by an explicit Newton approach. Efficient, robust solutions can be obtained for problems of any practical size or kind. Solution effort is approximately proportional to network size, and is relatively independent of the number of controls or binding inequalities. The key idea is a direct simultaneous solution for all of the unknowns in the Lagrangian function on each iteration. Each iteration minimizes a quadratic approximation of the Lagrangian. For any given set of binding constraints the process converges to the Kuhn-Tucker conditions in a few iterations. The challenge in algorithm development is to efficiently identify the binding inequalities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpas.1984.318284

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 942

Metadata

Authors
Sun, D., Ashley, B., Brewer, B., Hughes, A., & Tinney, W.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems
Published
1984-10
Volume
PAS-103
Issue
10
Pages
2864-2880
ISSN
0018-9510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978378863
Cited by
942
References
0
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Power Flow By Newton Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpas.1984.318284
The paper
Sun, D., Ashley, B., Brewer, B., Hughes, A., & Tinney, W. (1984). Optimal Power Flow By Newton Approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpas.1984.318284

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.