Cited by 58Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityText Readability and SimplificationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Use of Plain-Language Guidelines to Promote Health Literacy

Grene, Margaret, Cleary, Yvonne, Marcus-Quinn, Ann·2017·IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Abstract

Research problem: Studies by the American Institute of Medicine and the European Health Literacy Survey describe considerable levels of either inadequate or problematic health literacy. This health literacy problem is intensified when frontline healthcare practitioners must rely on printed education materials to compensate for the lack of time to instruct patients about their health management. Applying plain-language guidelines to health promotion materials may increase their effectiveness, particularly for patients with low health literacy. Research questions: 1. In what ways have plain-language guidelines been applied in health information materials for patients with varying degrees of health literacy, according to recent studies? 2. Have studies found that materials that apply plain-language guidelines are effective in health information promotion? Methodology: This article presents the findings from an integrative literature review of research into the use of plain language to promote health literacy. The systematic review identified scholarly, evidence-based studies that included reference to the use of plain-language guidelines. This article describes the detailed selection process and characterizes the corpus of articles along four dimensions: objectives, methodology, plain-language guidelines used, and findings. Results and conclusions: The review identified 13 articles that explored the use of plain-language guidelines in health literacy promotion. Analysis of these articles demonstrates that plain-language guidelines could play a strategic role in educating patients. Use of plain language could help healthcare practitioners to communicate critical and sometimes very complex health information effectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpc.2017.2761578

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grene, M., Cleary, Y., & Marcus-Quinn, A.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2017-12
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
384-400
ISSN
  • 0361-1434 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1500
OpenAlex
W2768136118
Cited by
58
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text Readability and Simplification
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
health literacy, health information materials, patient education, health promotion, health communication, patient-provider communication, low health literacy, health education materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review