Energy Efficient and Multi-resource Optimization for Virtual Machine Placement by Improving MOEA/D
Abstract
The explosive growth of cloud services has led to the widespread construction of large-scale data centers to meet diverse and multifaceted cloud computing demands. However, this expansion has resulted in substantial energy consumption. Virtual machine placement (VMP) has been extensively studied as a means to provide flexible and scalable cloud services while optimizing energy efficiency. Yet, the increasing complexity and diversity of applications have posted VMP suffering from waste of resources and bottlenecks due to unbalanced utilization of multi-dimensional resources. To address these issues, this article proposes a bi-objective optimization model for VMP that jointly optimizes power consumption and multi-dimensional resource utilization. Solving this large-scale bi-objective model presents a significant challenge in balancing performance and computational complexity. To tackle this, an enhanced decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA/D) based on$\varepsilon$-domination, termed$\varepsilon$-IMOEA/D-M2M is designed to provide solutions for the proposed optimization. Compared with both heuristics and evolutionary algorithms, performance evaluations demonstrate that our proposed VMP algorithm effectively reduces power consumption and balances multidimensional resource utilization while significantly decreasing running time compared to both heuristic and traditional evolutionary algorithms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MORLVMP focused on resource optimization and energy efficiency but neglected energy-aware distance measurements during clustering.
“For example, based on the schemes analyzed in Table 1, whereas MORLVMP [44] focused on resource optimization and energy efficiency, it neglected energy-aware distance measurements during clustering.”
From Carbon-Aware, Energy-Efficient, and SLA-Compliant Virtual Machine Placement in Cloud Data Centers Using Deep Q-Networks and Agglomerative Clustering (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Wei, W., Gu, H., Xiao, Z., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Xidian University (CN)
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Communication Networks, Hebei, China
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
- Published
- 2025-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1087-1099
- ISSN
- 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2183
- 2161-9883
- OpenAlex
- W4407354546
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 15.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62102302)
- Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- virtual machine placement, energy efficiency, multi-objective optimization, MOEA/D, bi-objective optimization, power consumption, cloud data centers, decomposition-based evolutionary algorithms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review