Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,133

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control

Casadei, D., Profumo, F., Serra, G., Tani, A.·2002·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

Field-oriented control and direct torque control are becoming the industrial standards for induction motors torque control. This paper is aimed at giving a contribution for a detailed comparison between the two control techniques, emphasizing advantages and disadvantages. The performance of the two control schemes is evaluated in terms of torque and current ripple, and transient response to step variations of the torque command. The analysis has been carried out on the basis of the results obtained by numerical simulations, where secondary effects introduced by hardware implementation are not present.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2002.802183

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,133

Metadata

Authors
Casadei, D., Profumo, F., Serra, G., & Tani, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2002-09
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
779-787
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2154712258
Cited by
1,133
References
0
FWCI
10.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2002.802183
The paper
Casadei, D., Profumo, F., Serra, G., & Tani, A. (2002). FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2002.802183

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.