Cited by 278Advanced DC-DC ConvertersWireless Power Transfer SystemsMultilevel Inverters and Converters

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tapped-inductor buck converter for high-step-down DC-DC conversion

Yao, K., Ye, M., Xu, M., Lee, F.C.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

The narrow duty cycle in the buck converter limits its application for high-step-down dc-dc conversion. With a simple structure, the tapped-inductor buck converter shows promise for extending the duty cycle. However, the leakage inductance causes a huge turn-off voltage spike across the top switch. Also, the gate drive for the top switch is not simple due to its floating source connection. This paper solves all these problems by modifying the tapped-inductor structure. A simple lossless clamp circuit can effectively clamp the switch turn-off voltage spike and totally recover the leakage energy. Experimental results for 12V-to-1.5V and 48V-to-6V dc-dc conversions show significant improvements in efficiency.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2005.850920

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extreme duty cycle operation of conventional converters leads to high voltage and current stress, hence, it suffers from reduced controllability and extreme losses.

    “Nevertheless, the extreme duty cycle operation of conventional converters leads to high voltage and current stress, hence, it suffers from reduced controllability and extreme losses [60].”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Small Satellite Microgrids (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Lange, 1979, Tapped inductor improves efficiency for switching regulator, Electron. Design, 27, 114
  2. 10.1109/CIPE.1998.779667 · DOI
  3. Lenk, Introduction to the tapped buck converter, 155
  4. 10.1049/el:20010141 · DOI
  5. Park, The zero voltage switching (ZVS) critical conduction mode (CCM) buck converter with tapped-inductor, 1077
  6. Wei, Comparison of three topology candidates for 12V VRM, 245
  7. 10.1109/APEC.2001.911656 · DOI
  8. Lethellier, 2000, Buck Converter With Inductive Turn Ratio Optimization
  9. 10.1049/cp:20020158 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/INTLEC.1986.4794432 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/PESC.1987.7077193 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/APEC.1994.316287 · DOI
  13. Zhou, A high power density, high efficiency and fast transient voltage regulator module with a novel current sensing and current sharing technique, 289
  14. Chen, Integrated planar inductor scheme for multimode interleaved quasi-square-wave DC/DC converter, 201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yao, K., Ye, M., Xu, M., & Lee, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Monolithic Power Systems (United States) (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2005-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
775-780
ISSN
0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119758109
Cited by
278
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
Keywords
leakage inductance, converter efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review