Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 865

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance Evaluation of Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifiers

Huber, L., Yungtaek Jang, Jovanovic, M.M.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

In this paper, a systematic review of bridgeless power factor correction (PFC) boost rectifiers, also called dual boost PFC rectifiers, is presented. Performance comparison between the conventional PFC boost rectifier and a representative member of the bridgeless PFC boost rectifier family is performed. Loss analysis and experimental efficiency evaluation for both CCM and DCM/CCM boundary operations are provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2008.921107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 865

Metadata

Authors
Huber, L., Jang, Y., & Jovanovic, M. M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2008-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
1381-1390
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2143552116
Cited by
865
References
0
FWCI
31.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Evaluation of Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifiers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2008.921107
The paper
Huber, L., Jang, Y., & Jovanovic, M. M. (2008). Performance Evaluation of Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifiers. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2008.921107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.