The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fault-Tolerant Control of Dual Three-Phase Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives Under Open-Phase Faults
Abstract
In this paper, a fault-tolerant control is proposed for dual three-phase permanent-magnet synchronous machine (PMSM) drives under open-phase faults. The object of the proposed fault-tolerant control is to maximize the torque capacity while the overcurrent protection is taken into account. Hence, the proposed fault-tolerant control is named as torque mode in this paper. Another existed fault-tolerant control for dual three-phase PMSM drives under open-phase faults is loss mode, in which the system copper loss is minimized. Torque mode is compared with loss mode, and two important conclusions are given: 1) loss mode can reduce more copper loss; and 2) torque mode can output more torque. The performances of torque mode and loss mode are verified by experimental results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dieterle, O., Greiner, T., & Heidrich, P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2018.2835422 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, W., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., & Li, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2052-2063
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2342681529
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fault-Tolerant Control of Dual Three-Phase Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives Under Open-Phase Faults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2016.2559498
- The paper
- Wang, W., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., & Li, S. (2017). Fault-Tolerant Control of Dual Three-Phase Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine Drives Under Open-Phase Faults. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2016.2559498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
