Cited by 147Multilevel Inverters and ConvertersElectric Motor Design and AnalysisHVDC Systems and Fault Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MMC-Based SRM Drives With Decentralized Battery Energy Storage System for Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Gan, Chun, Sun, Qingguo, Wu, Jianhua, Kong, Wubin, Shi, Cenwei, Hu, Yihua·2019·IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

Abstract

This paper proposes a modular multilevel converter (MMC) based switched reluctance motor (SRM) drive with decentralized battery energy storage system for hybrid electric vehicle applications. In the proposed drive, a battery cell and a half-bridge converter is connected as a submodule (SM), and multiple SMs are connected together for the MMC. The modular full-bridge converter is employed to drive the motor. Flexible charging and discharging functions for each SM are obtained by controlling switches in SMs. Multiple working modes and functions are achieved. Compared to conventional and existing SRM drives, there are several advantages for the proposed topology. A lower dc-bus voltage can be flexibly achieved by selecting SM operation states, which can dramatically reduce the voltage stress on the switches. Multilevel phase voltage is obtained to improve the torque capability. Battery state-of-charge balance can be achieved by independently controlling each SM. Flexible fault-tolerance ability for battery cells is equipped. The battery can be flexibly charged under both running and standstill conditions. Furthermore, a completely modular structure is achieved by using standard half-bridge modules, which is beneficial for market mass production. Experiments carried out on a three-phase 12/8 SRM confirm the effectiveness of the proposed SRM drive.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpel.2018.2846622

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2557579 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2535463 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1109/TIE.2017.2733478 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/TIA.2013.2265873 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TIE.2010.2051938 · DOI
  6. 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2780622 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TIE.2016.2631118 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2396873 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TPEL.2008.925206 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/TIE.2007.895117 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/TIA.2016.2533604 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TIE.2014.2304699 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2583467 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TPEL.2007.911799 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2409052 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2642339 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2521351 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/TIA.2017.2732341 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TIE.2010.2040558 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/TPEL.2007.904240 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2426142 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TIA.2005.853390 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TVT.2010.2057268 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2047407 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TTE.2017.2775801 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.048 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TIE.2014.2336599 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2723542 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/TEC.2014.2343962 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2562103 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TIE.2012.2196015 · DOI
  32. 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2316272 · DOI
  33. 10.1109/TIE.2017.2711574 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2441035 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/TEC.2015.2499086 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/TIA.2016.2564344 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/TIE.2016.2577543 · DOI
  38. 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2782562 · DOI
  39. 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2236106 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2260562 · DOI
  41. 10.1109/TTE.2015.2470092 · DOI
  42. 10.1109/TIE.2008.922768 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1109/TPEL.2006.872371 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/TIE.2014.2301754 · DOI
  45. 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2279185 · DOI
  46. 10.1109/TTE.2017.2649883 · DOI
  47. 10.1109/TTE.2018.2817123 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/TTE.2017.2710628 · DOI
  49. 10.1109/TIA.2014.2313657 · DOI
  50. 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2450757 · DOI
  51. 10.1109/TASC.2018.2799838 · DOI
  52. 10.1109/APEC.2016.7468274 · DOI
  53. 10.1049/iet-epa.2009.0260 · DOI
  54. 10.1109/IECON.2013.6699545 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gan, C., Sun, Q., Wu, J., Kong, W., Shi, C., & Hu, Y.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Published
2019-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
2608-2621
ISSN
  • 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0107
OpenAlex
W2808903174
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Motor Design and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Keywords
modular multilevel converter, switched reluctance motor, hybrid electric vehicles, half-bridge converter, battery state of charge balancing, fault tolerance, battery charging, torque capability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review